2017
DOI: 10.1088/2051-672x/aa9667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the interfacial thermal properties of two rough surfaces in contact in preimpregnated composites consolidation

Abstract: Composite manufacturing processes usually proceed from preimpregnated preforms that are consolidated by simultaneously applying heat and pressure ensuring a perfect contact compulsory for making possible molecular diffusion. However, fine representations and descriptions of surfaces remain challenging because the necessity of representing their finest scale details. Even if in reality two rough surfaces are put in contact, heated and then squeezed, the associated numerical simulation becomes in most cases extr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7a, b, we find that the gaps are equal between rough-rough and rough-smooth assemblies for different chemical vapor potentials (Uv), which proves the geometric validity of the Greenwood and Williamson technique. However, according to the work of Saoudi et al [20], the validity of this technique does not resist a thermal problem, because for the self-affine geometry, the roughness makes this assumption less and less valid. In the opposite limit, using this technique on flat surfaces may be acceptable.…”
Section: Rough-rough To Rough-smooth Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7a, b, we find that the gaps are equal between rough-rough and rough-smooth assemblies for different chemical vapor potentials (Uv), which proves the geometric validity of the Greenwood and Williamson technique. However, according to the work of Saoudi et al [20], the validity of this technique does not resist a thermal problem, because for the self-affine geometry, the roughness makes this assumption less and less valid. In the opposite limit, using this technique on flat surfaces may be acceptable.…”
Section: Rough-rough To Rough-smooth Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another usual procedure consists of studying surface correlations [Saoudi et al, 2017;Mirabella and Aldao, 2016], with the height correlation function calculated from…”
Section: Surface Descriptors and Scaling Exponentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modelling conduction at rough interfaces under compression has attracted extensive and increasing interests since contact models by Greenwood et al [13,14], followed by models [4,[15][16][17] with assumed surface roughness statistics and elastoplastic behaviour of individual asperities. Recent years also witnessed advances in understanding contact and conduction behaviour at rough interfaces with the development of novel numerical tools, such as studies on electrical conduction by finite element methods (FEM) [18], contact stiffness by boundary element method (BEM) [19], adhesion by molecular dynamics (MD) [20], thermal conduction by FEM [21,22]. However, scale-dependent electrical properties and multi-physic phenomena at interfaces bring numerical challenges in efficiently and precisely simulating electrical contact resistance at rough interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%