2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00209-019-02350-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the local converse theorem and the descent theorem in families

Abstract: In this paper, we prove an analogue of Jacquet's conjecture on the local converse theorem for ℓ-adic families of co-Whittaker representations of GL n (F ), where F is a finite extension of Q p and ℓ = p. We also prove an analogue of Jacquet's conjecture for a descent theorem, which asks for the smallest collection of gamma factors determining the subring of definition of an ℓadic family. These two theorems are closely related to the local Langlands correspondence in ℓ-adic families.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof of Theorem 7.1. The only part of the proof of the main theorem in [LM19] that requires reducedness and -torsion freeness is the completeness of Whittaker models statement [LM19, Theorem 4.1]. After replacing Theorem 4.1 in [LM19] with Theorem 5.1 of the present paper and applying the argument of [LM19, Sections 4-6] mutatis mutandis, we obtain Theorem 7.1.…”
Section: §7 the Mod-converse Theoremmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof of Theorem 7.1. The only part of the proof of the main theorem in [LM19] that requires reducedness and -torsion freeness is the completeness of Whittaker models statement [LM19, Theorem 4.1]. After replacing Theorem 4.1 in [LM19] with Theorem 5.1 of the present paper and applying the argument of [LM19, Sections 4-6] mutatis mutandis, we obtain Theorem 7.1.…”
Section: §7 the Mod-converse Theoremmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Recently, the proof of Jacquet's conjecture was extended to the setting of reduced -torsion-free W (k)-algebras in the preprint [LM19] of Liu and the author. As the counterexample in Section 2 of the present article shows, the converse theorem in the -torsion setting requires a different framework from [LM19].…”
Section: Relation To Other Work and Further Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%