2018 International Symposium on Information Theory and Its Applications (ISITA) 2018
DOI: 10.23919/isita.2018.8664288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Local Erasure Correction Capacity of Convolutional Codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Binary tail-biting convolutional codes were proposed as LRCs in [7], [38], but sliding-window repair was not considered. Locality properties of more general (but still binary) convolutional codes were recently considered in [14]. However, LRCCs and sliding-window repair as considered in this work were not treated in [14].…”
Section: Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binary tail-biting convolutional codes were proposed as LRCs in [7], [38], but sliding-window repair was not considered. Locality properties of more general (but still binary) convolutional codes were recently considered in [14]. However, LRCCs and sliding-window repair as considered in this work were not treated in [14].…”
Section: Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binary tail-biting convolutional codes were proposed as LRCs in [7,36], but sliding-window repair was not considered. Locality properties of more general (but still binary) convolutional codes were recently considered in [14]. However, LRCCs and sliding-window repair as considered in this work were not treated in [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Locality properties of more general (but still binary) convolutional codes were recently considered in [14]. However, LRCCs and sliding-window repair as considered in this work were not treated in [14]. Rateless streaming codes (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%