2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2017.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the prospects of cross-calibrating the Cherenkov Telescope Array with an airborne calibration platform

Abstract: Recent advances in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology have made UAVs an attractive possibility as an airborne calibration platform for astronomical facilities. This is especially true for arrays of telescopes spread over a large area such as the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA). In this paper, the feasibility of using UAVs to calibrate CTA is investigated. Assuming a UAV at 1km altitude above CTA, operating on astronomically clear nights with stratified, low atmospheric dust content, appropriate thermal p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that after such a carefully prepared calibration scheme, the optical bandwidth of the full telescope can be determined with a resolution of <1% (LST and MST) and <5% (SST) on time scales of better than a minute and an accuracy of better than 4% (LST and MST) and 5% (SST). This is considerably better than other proposed methods so far (Gaug 2014;Brown 2018;Stefanik et al 2019) and only slightly worse than the cross-calibration scheme proposed by Mitchell et al (2016b), which allows, however, only for a relative calibration between telescopes or telescope types. Other direct methods (Segreto et al 2016) perform even better and show more flexibility but require a dedicated setup and cannot be carried out at the same time as the telescopes perform science observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We find that after such a carefully prepared calibration scheme, the optical bandwidth of the full telescope can be determined with a resolution of <1% (LST and MST) and <5% (SST) on time scales of better than a minute and an accuracy of better than 4% (LST and MST) and 5% (SST). This is considerably better than other proposed methods so far (Gaug 2014;Brown 2018;Stefanik et al 2019) and only slightly worse than the cross-calibration scheme proposed by Mitchell et al (2016b), which allows, however, only for a relative calibration between telescopes or telescope types. Other direct methods (Segreto et al 2016) perform even better and show more flexibility but require a dedicated setup and cannot be carried out at the same time as the telescopes perform science observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…where 0 ≤ ε i ≤ 1 refers to the percentage of the nominal optical efficiency of a telescope i andR 0 i j is the trigger rate estimate for ε i = ε j = 1. Note that the optical efficiencies of telescopes have to be estimated in an independent procedure [11][12][13][14]. A further influence of the telescope hardware is the possibility of adapting the camera trigger thresholds to the measured rates of individual camera pixels.…”
Section: Extension Of the Cherenkov Transparency Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in UAV technology have made them an attractive possibility as airborne calibration platforms for astronomical facilities (e.g. [1,2,3,4,5]). This is especially true for telescope arrays, where the maneuverability, flexibility and versatility of a UAV-based calibration system allows us to rapidily calibrate the numerous detector elements spread over a large area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical separation between individual telescope elements adds another level of complexity to these additional calibration requirements. Furthermore, if the telescope elements are spread over a large enough area, additional uncertainties, such as spatially dependent environmental factors, need to be characterised and calibrated [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation