On the Relationship Between Circumplexes: Affect and Wiggins' IAS

Yik, Michelle; Russell, James A.

doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_4

Cited by 25 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 87 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A third reason has to do with the relative breadth and focus of these dimensions. For instance, as extraversion vs. detachment is a broad trait that is central to both interpersonal behavior and affective experiences (DeYoung, Quilty, & Peterson, 2007;Yik & Russell, 2004), it is "split apart" in the interpersonal and affective circles as described above, which creates some potential for confusion. Despite these issues, we believe that connecting dispositions to dynamic systems can lead to a highly generative and holistic model of personality and related dysfunction.…”

Section: Putting It All Togethermentioning

confidence: 99%

Connecting Personality Structure and Dynamics: Towards a More Evidence-Based and Clinically Useful Diagnostic Scheme

Hopwood

Zimmermann

Pincus

et al. 2015

Journal of Personality Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this special issue of the Journal of Personality Disorders is to promote the integration of personality structure and dynamics towards more evidence-based and clinically useful conceptualizations of personality pathology. In this article, we describe a contemporary model of personality structure that is useful for distinguishing patients from one another and the connections between this structure and within-person dynamics that occur across different levels of an individual personality, across situations, and within situations. In so doing, we connect the personality trait tradition that has tended to emphasize stable individual differences with traditions that have tended to focus on the more dynamic aspects of interpersonal behavior and emotional experience. We then introduce the empirical articles in this special issue within this integrative context, in order to demonstrate the value in connecting personality structure to dynamics for research and practice.

show abstract

Section: Putting It All Togethermentioning

confidence: 99%

Connecting Personality Structure and Dynamics: Towards a More Evidence-Based and Clinically Useful Diagnostic Scheme

Hopwood

Zimmermann

Pincus

et al. 2015

Journal of Personality Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Fabrigar, Visser, and Browne (1997) have argued for the importance of such methods and have demonstrated the use of CIRCUM (Browne, 1992), a program designed specifically to test covariance matrices for circumplex structure. CIRCUM has now been used in a variety of studies to conduct confirmatory analyses (e.g., Gurtman & Pincus, 2000; Schmidt, Wagner & Kiesler, 1999; Yik & Russell, 2004). As an alternative (or perhaps complement) to CIRCUM, RANDALL (Tracey, 1997) is a program that tests for structure by examining the hypothesized circular order relations among octant intercorrelations.…”

Section: Circumplex Measures Of Personalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…What makes an interpersonal circumplex 'interpersonal'? This is an important question in part because circumplex models have also been proposed for other personality domains, including those of affect (e.g., Yik & Russell, 2004), vocational interests (e.g., Tracey, 2000) and various pairings of Big Five factors (Hofstee, de Raad, & Goldberg, 1992). In considering this issue, Wiggins and Trobst (1997) cogently observed: 'To assert that a circumplex is an interpersonal circumplex requires both an empirically demonstrated circumplex structure and a plausible substantive rationale for placing an interpersonal interpretation on the measures that gave rise to the circumplex' (p. 58, italics in original).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring Personality with the Interpersonal Circumplex

Gurtman

2009

Social & Personality Psych

202

113

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The interpersonal circumplex can serve as both companion and guide for those interested in exploring the interpersonal domain of personality. This article offers a relatively nontechnical overview of the model and its various applications in the study of personality. I begin by defining the interpersonal circumplex, its structure and in what sense it is ‘interpersonal’. As part of that, I will briefly consider how circumplex measures of personality, such as the Interpersonal Adjective Scales, are typically evaluated for fit to the model. I will next describe applications of the model for exploring both the idiographic (person‐centered) and nomothetic (variable‐centered) realms of personality. In person‐centered research, the circumplex leads to useful ways of summarizing the basic interpersonal features of a given individual. In variable‐centered research, the circumplex can help elucidate the essential interpersonal meaning of personality constructs such as traits, problems, and motives. To explain how the circumplex can help us explore personality – idiographically and nomothetically – I will draw on a variety of studies, including several recent studies that extend the model in new ways.

show abstract

“…In shame-based rage, felt shame is bypassed, eliciting rage and aggression. The interpersonal behavior associated with rage and aggression would be characterized by hostile-dominance (Smith, Glazer, Ruiz, & Gallo, 2004;Yik & Russell, 2004).…”

Section: Morrismentioning

confidence: 99%

The Pathoplastic Relationship Between Interpersonal Problems and Fear of Failure

Wright

Pincus

Conroy

et al. 2009

Journal of Personality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study advances the understanding of fear of failure (FF), a dispositional avoidance-oriented achievement motive, by employing interpersonal classification techniques to groups of individuals who fear failure in order to examine the pathoplastic relations between FF and interpersonal problems. Shame-based FF is thought to be related to the self-regulation strategies of appeasement and aggression, and these strategies are hypothesized to be associated with the interpersonal problems of Nonassertiveness and Vindictiveness, respectively. Using 2 independent samples (ns=60 and 38) reporting high FF, interpersonal profiles were examined for the groups in their entirety and for cluster solutions within the larger samples. Results demonstrated that individuals high in FF exhibited 1 of 2 prototypical interpersonal profiles associated with Domineering/Vindictive or Nonassertive/Exploitable problems that correspond with the hypothesized aggression and appeasement regulation strategies. Consistent with the concept of pathoplasticity, these differences were not better accounted for by demographic, affective, motivational, personality, or attachment style characteristics of the samples.

show abstract

On the Relationship Between Circumplexes: Affect and Wiggins' IAS

Cited by 25 publications

References 87 publications

Connecting Personality Structure and Dynamics: Towards a More Evidence-Based and Clinically Useful Diagnostic Scheme

Connecting Personality Structure and Dynamics: Towards a More Evidence-Based and Clinically Useful Diagnostic Scheme

Exploring Personality with the Interpersonal Circumplex

The Pathoplastic Relationship Between Interpersonal Problems and Fear of Failure

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About