2021
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09169-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the scalar $$\varvec{\pi K}$$ form factor beyond the elastic region

Abstract: Pion–kaon ($$\pi K$$ π K ) pairs occur frequently as final states in heavy-particle decays. A consistent treatment of $$\pi K$$ π K scattering and production amplitudes over a wide energy range is therefore mandatory for multiple applications: in Standard Model tests; to describe crossed channels in the quest for exotic hadr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…'We' have listened a nice talk by Noel at the TAU2021 Workshop; one can read it in the Proceedungs [3] 3 . It is based on his article [4]. His talk was clearer (in my view) than in his article about finding CP violation there, but also a sign of ND.…”
Section: The Theoretical 'Landscape'mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…'We' have listened a nice talk by Noel at the TAU2021 Workshop; one can read it in the Proceedungs [3] 3 . It is based on his article [4]. His talk was clearer (in my view) than in his article about finding CP violation there, but also a sign of ND.…”
Section: The Theoretical 'Landscape'mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…My main question is the title: "On the scalar πK form factor beyond the elastic region" both in his talk & his article[4]. First he discussed the tools for analyzing data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For recent discussions about the two-hadron tensor form factors, the readers are also referred to refs. [41,118,121,122].…”
Section: Jhep01(2022)108mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the initial null results from CLEO [28,29] and Belle [30], a non-zero CP asymmetry was reported for the first time by the BaBar collaboration [31], by measuring the decay-rate difference between τ + and τ − decays. However, such a measurement is in conflict with the SM prediction [27,[32][33][34] at the level of 2.8σ, which has motivated many NP explanations by including the extra contribution from non-standard tensor interactions [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. Unfortunately, the suppression of the relative phase between the Kπ vector and tensor form factors as well as the combined constraints from other relevant observables have already excluded such a possibility [34][35][36].…”
Section: Jhep01(2022)108 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the recent data on XYZ states come from electroweak processes, as heavy meson/baryon decays or e + e − annihilation. Matrix elements can most often be studied in terms of form factors [178,482,483].…”
Section: Production Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%