2010
DOI: 10.5802/aif.2615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the spectral theory and dynamics of asymptotically hyperbolic manifolds

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 1.1 of [Rowlett 2009] was restated in Theorem 5.1 of [Rowlett 2010], which is therefore subject to the same correction; it was also applied in [Borthwick and Perry 2011], but without use of the remainder estimate for large time, so the results there are unaffected. Corollary 1.2 of [Rowlett 2009] (restated in [Rowlett 2010] as Corollary 5.2) should be corrected as follows. Corollary 1.2.…”
Section: Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theorem 1.1 of [Rowlett 2009] was restated in Theorem 5.1 of [Rowlett 2010], which is therefore subject to the same correction; it was also applied in [Borthwick and Perry 2011], but without use of the remainder estimate for large time, so the results there are unaffected. Corollary 1.2 of [Rowlett 2009] (restated in [Rowlett 2010] as Corollary 5.2) should be corrected as follows. Corollary 1.2.…”
Section: Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Theorem 1.4 of [Rowlett 2009], a factor of h was omitted in the numerator; this was corrected in Theorem 4.4 of [Rowlett 2010]. An additional technical assumption, that the length-spectrum is nonarithmetic (see [Rowlett et al 2011, §4]), was also missing.…”
Section: Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theorem 1.1 of [Rowlett 2009] was restated in Theorem 5.1 of [Rowlett 2010], which is therefore subject to the same correction; it was also applied in [Borthwick and Perry 2011], but without use of the remainder estimate for large time, so the results there are unaffected. Corollary 1.2 of [Rowlett 2009] (restated in [Rowlett 2010] as Corollary 5.2) should be corrected as follows.…”
Section: Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%