Proceedings of 1994 Workshop on Information Theory and Statistics
DOI: 10.1109/wits.1994.513908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the theory and application of universal classification to signal detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“….The span of the quantizer is determined such that all samples of X M fall into the range of the quantizer. It should be noted that in [2] it was shown that the performance of the universal receiver did not degrade significantly when employed with a quantizer with sufficient resolution and span. Because of this, and based on our own observations, in this short paper we will not focus on the quantizer as a design issue.…”
Section: A a Blind Traaning Algorathmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“….The span of the quantizer is determined such that all samples of X M fall into the range of the quantizer. It should be noted that in [2] it was shown that the performance of the universal receiver did not degrade significantly when employed with a quantizer with sufficient resolution and span. Because of this, and based on our own observations, in this short paper we will not focus on the quantizer as a design issue.…”
Section: A a Blind Traaning Algorathmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asymptotically optiw 11 receivers based upon the original work of Gutman [l] and Ziv 141 have been rece[,'iy proposed by Warke and Orsak [2] and Paris, Orsak,Warke and Chen [3]. These receivers extract statistically suficient channel information from training sets obtained from the channel.…”
Section: A Empirical Receiversmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations