2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b00799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the True Indium Content of In-Filled Skutterudites

Abstract: The incongruently melting single-filled skutterudite InxCo4Sb12 is known as a promising bulk thermoelectric material. However, the products of current bulk syntheses contain always impurities of InSb, Sb, CoSb, or CoSb2, which prevent an unbiased determination of its thermoelectric properties. We report a new two-step synthesis of high-purity InxCo4Sb12 with nominal compositions x = 0.12, 0.15, 0.18, and 0.20 that separates the kieftite (CoSb3) formation from the topotactic filler insertion. This approach allo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

7
45
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
7
45
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Though the spatial resolution of EDS analysis prevented us from quantitatively investigating the composition of nanoparticles, we speculate that those nanoparticles would be InSb because the formation of InSb nanoparticles in In-rich samples was reported in previous papers. 27,28) in the skutterudite phase increased with increasing x at x ≤ 0.7 and then decreased at x > 0.7, while the Fe/Co ratio of all samples were kept nearly constant at 0.25 ± 0.02. This result also indicates that the lling fraction limit of In would be 0.43, which was determined for the sample prepared at x 0.7 by means of EDS analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Though the spatial resolution of EDS analysis prevented us from quantitatively investigating the composition of nanoparticles, we speculate that those nanoparticles would be InSb because the formation of InSb nanoparticles in In-rich samples was reported in previous papers. 27,28) in the skutterudite phase increased with increasing x at x ≤ 0.7 and then decreased at x > 0.7, while the Fe/Co ratio of all samples were kept nearly constant at 0.25 ± 0.02. This result also indicates that the lling fraction limit of In would be 0.43, which was determined for the sample prepared at x 0.7 by means of EDS analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Figure 2 shows the temperature dependences of the Seebeck coefficient S, electrical resistivity ρ, and power factor S 2 ρ −1 for the samples of (Ga 0. 8 47 The In 0.12 Co 4 Sb 12 sample, as a reference for comparison, was taken with consideration for In content close to the sample with x = 0.45. 47 The sample with nominal composition In 0.12 Co 4 Sb 12 , as a reference sample, was taken with consideration for In content of the sample with x = 0.45.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 47 The In 0.12 Co 4 Sb 12 sample, as a reference for comparison, was taken with consideration for In content close to the sample with x = 0.45. 47 The sample with nominal composition In 0.12 Co 4 Sb 12 , as a reference sample, was taken with consideration for In content of the sample with x = 0.45. 47 The S values for all samples (except for x = 0.05) were negative across the entire temperature range between room temperature and 773 K. For the samples with x = 0.150.35, the absolute values of both S and ρ decreased with x, mainly due to increase in the carrier concentration caused by the introduction of Ga and In species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations