2003
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.349020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Value of Influence Activities for Capital Budgeting

Abstract: This paper shows that a capital budgeting process in which the division manager is required to engage in personally costly influence activities prior to a project approval has beneficial incentive effects: It provides the manager with incentives to acquire costly information about project prospects and helps to elicit the revelation of the acquired information. As a consequence, imposing influence costs on the manager can lead to improved capital allocations. The optimal level of influence costs, chosen by the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The act of lobbying reveals to the firm which projects are worth defending, and the fear of fighting for the wrong project motivates the manager to gather more information in the first place. Similar to Laux (2008), we find that companies can improve profits by allowing the sales force to lobby for lower prices, which explains why lobbying is ubiquitous despite its seemingly wasteful nature. In this sense, our paper is also related to Hauser, Simester and Wernerfelt (1997), who discover that side payments need not reduce firm profits, and to Simester and Zhang (2010), who find that allowing bad products to continue can help companies motivate product managers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The act of lobbying reveals to the firm which projects are worth defending, and the fear of fighting for the wrong project motivates the manager to gather more information in the first place. Similar to Laux (2008), we find that companies can improve profits by allowing the sales force to lobby for lower prices, which explains why lobbying is ubiquitous despite its seemingly wasteful nature. In this sense, our paper is also related to Hauser, Simester and Wernerfelt (1997), who discover that side payments need not reduce firm profits, and to Simester and Zhang (2010), who find that allowing bad products to continue can help companies motivate product managers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…One notable exception to this influence activities literature is Laux (2008), who argues that influence activities can benefit the firm's capital budgeting process. The act of lobbying reveals to the firm which projects are worth defending, and the fear of fighting for the wrong project motivates the manager to gather more information in the first place.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For low-value projects the cost of providing information rents to the manager may lead the firm to abandon the project altogether. In a more recent paper, Laux (2008) argues that imposing influence costs on an internal project manager may improve capital budgeting. By requiring that the manager spend time and effort developing internal support for a project, the firm can implement a screening mechanism.…”
Section: Other Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manager's willingness to engage in influence activities reveals his private information about the project's prospects. Bernardo, Cai and Luo (2001) and Laux (2008) both exploit an assumption that the manager enjoys private benefits from controlling more capital, reflecting a preference for "empire building" (see also Harris and Raviv 1998). As a result, the manager is biased in favor of the project.…”
Section: Other Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large companies, on the other hand, have better access to external funding (collateral, credit, etc. ) and, for the investment appraisal, use more formal methods such as capital budgeting (Laux 2008;Sandahl and Sjogren 2003;Verbeeten 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%