Oncoplastic breast consortium recommendations for mastectomy and whole breast reconstruction in the setting of post-mastectomy radiation therapy

Weber, Walter; Shaw, Jane; Pusic, Andrea L.; Wyld, Lynda; Morrow, Monica; King, Tari A.; Mátrai, Zoltán; Heil, Jörg; Fitzal, Florian; Potter, Shelley; Rubio, Isabel T.; Cardoso, M.J.; Gentilini, Oreste Davide; Galimberti, Viviana; Sacchini, Virgilio; Rutgers, Emiel J. T.; Benson, John R.; Allweis, Tanir; Haug, Martin; Paulinelli, Régis Resende; Kovács, Tibor; Harder, Yves; Güllüoğlu, Bahadır M.; González, Eduardo; Faridi, Andreé; Elder, Elisabeth; Dubsky, Peter; Blohmer, Jens-Uwe; Bjelic‐Radisic, Vesna; Barry, Mitchel; Hay, Susanne Dieroff; Bowles, Kimberly; French, James; Reitsamer, Roland; Koller, Rupert; Schrenk, Peter; Kauer-Dorner, Daniela; Biazús, Jorge Villanova; Brenelli, Fabrício; Letzkus, Jaime; Saccilotto, Ramon; Joukainen, Sarianna; Kauhanen, Susanna; Karhunen-Enckell, Ulla; Hoffmann, Juergen; Kneser, Ulrich; Kühn, Thorsten; Kontos, Michalis; Tampaki, Ekaterini Christina; Carmon, Moshe; Hadar, Tal; Catanuto, Giuseppe; Garcia–Etienne, Carlos A.; Koppert, L.; Gouveia, Pedro; Lagergren, Jesper; Svensjö, Tor; Maggi, Nadia; Kappos, Elisabeth A.; Schwab, Fabienne D.; Castrezana, Liliana; Steffens, Daniel; Krol, Janna; Tausch, Christoph; Günthert, Andreas R.; Knauer, Michael; Katapodi, Maria C.; Bucher, Susanne; Hauser, Nik; Kurzeder, Christian; Mucklow, Rosine; Tsoutsou, Pelagia G.; Sezer, Atakan; Çakmak, Güldeniz Karadeniz; Karanlık, Hasan; Fairbrother, Patricia; Romics, László; Montagna, Giacomo; Urban, Cı́cero de Andrade; Walker, Melanie; Formenti, Silvia; Gruber, Guenther; Zimmermann, Frank; Zwahlen, Daniel R.; Küemmel, Sherko; El‐Tamer, Mahmoud; Peeters, M.J. Vrancken; Kaidar‐Person, Orit; Gnant, Michael; Poortmans, Philip; Boniface, Jana de

doi:10.1016/j.breast.2022.03.008

Cited by 32 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“… 47 The study involves over 2000 women who underwent mastectomy, with the goal of understanding how to improve patient outcomes and quality of life. 48 The initial findings from the MROC study have already yielded important insights into breast reconstruction surgery. For example, the study found that women who underwent immediate breast reconstruction reported higher levels of satisfaction with their reconstruction than women who underwent delayed reconstruction.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Advances in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction

Xie¹,

Yan²,

Zhu³

et al. 2023

TCRM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Breast reconstruction can be divided into prepectoral breast reconstruction (PPBR) and subpectoral breast reconstruction (SPBR) according to the implant plane. The original prepectoral breast reconstruction was abandoned for a long time due to the frequent and severe complications. Now, advances in materials technology and improved methods of mastectomy have made safe prepectoral breast reconstruction possible. Moreover, a number of studies have gradually demonstrated the advantages of prepectoral breast reconstruction. As prepectoral breast reconstruction becomes more and more attractive, it is time to review the current advances in prepectoral breast reconstruction.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Advances in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction

Xie¹,

Yan²,

Zhu³

et al. 2023

TCRM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, the reconstructive surgical technique, whether implant based or autologous, should remain the same even in patient who will require post mastectomy radiation therapy. Despite reported data of potential increase in surgical and wound related complications in IBR and to a lesser extent Autologous reconstruction, current literature suggests that there are no absolute contraindications for implant based reconstructions in the setting of post mastectomy radiation therapy [50].…”

Section: The Impact Of Post Mastectomy Radiation Therapy On Breast Re...mentioning

confidence: 95%

Breast Reconstructive Options

Liliav¹,

Torres-Strauss²

2023

Breast Cancer Updates

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Breast reconstructive options have evolved over the past six decades. Despite advancements in technology, improved therapeutic options, and genetic testing, women are still, unfortunately, faced with a myriad of deformities after treatments for breast cancer. In order to restore an esthetically pleasing breast mound, a careful evaluation of the patient must be taken into account. There are, generally, three components or factors that need to be considered while devising an excellent reconstructive option for a particular patient. These are: patient factors, surgeons’ factors, and oncologic factors. It is only with a detailed understanding of each one of these factors that a sound solution is arrived at. In this chapter, we will explore the various modalities of breast reconstruction available to patients. We will also demonstrate specific considerations in order to optimize an excellent outcome for our breast cancer patients.

show abstract

“…The panel preferred immediate or delayed-immediate autologous reconstruction over implant-based reconstruction because the former is associated with a lower risk of complications in the long term; however, they do not consider any form of reconstruction to be absolutely contraindicated by PMRT. 26…”

Section: Breast Reconstruction In the Context Of Adjunctive Breast Ca...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: an overview of the state of the art, challenges, and prospects

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Breast cancer, which affects approximately 12% of women worldwide, is a leading cause of death and morbidity, and the majority of cases are treated surgically. The loss of one or both breasts to cancer can be devastating and it often has negative physical and psychological impact on women. In order to maintain an outward breast contour, some women turn to temporary solutions, such as breast pads, which are often unsatisfactory. Over the years, patients' perceptions of their bodies, self-esteem levels and quality of life have all improved as a result of less radical breast cancer surgeries and the growing popularity of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Therefore, it is recommended that women undergoing breast cancer surgeries be given the choice of breast reconstruction. Nevertheless, accessibility, acceptability, and affordability of breast reconstruction still pose a challenge. Although these limitations exist globally, they are most noticeable in low- and middle-income nations. This article gives an overview of the various considerations and surgical options for breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery. In addition, it examines some of the challenges to breast reconstruction faced worldwide and discusses recent and future trends which are bound to improve post-mastectomy breast reconstruction techniques and outcomes globally.

show abstract

Oncoplastic breast consortium recommendations for mastectomy and whole breast reconstruction in the setting of post-mastectomy radiation therapy

Cited by 32 publications

References 59 publications

Advances in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction

Advances in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction

Breast Reconstructive Options

Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: an overview of the state of the art, challenges, and prospects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About