“… 9,37,43 Meanwhile, the IAST selectivity for CO 2 /C 2 H 4 (50/50, v/v ) reached 6.4, which was superior or comparable to most benchmark one‐step C 2 H 4 separation adsorbents such as that of UTSA‐16 (5.7), ZNU‐6 (7.8), and NTU‐65 (2.5) at 1.0 bar (Table S7). 11,25,28 Given the high CO 2 uptake (65 cm 3 g −1 ) at 0.5 bar, the binary CO 2 /C 2 H 4 co‐adsorption isotherm was predicated by IAST calculations (Figure 2E). SIFSIX‐TEPE‐Cu exhibited a comparable CO 2 capacity (59 cm 3 g −1 ) with UTSA‐16, ZNU‐6, and NTU‐67, meanwhile exhibiting the lowest C 2 H 4 co‐adsorption capacity of 9 cm 3 g −1 24,25,28 .…”