2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-year objective and functional outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of vaginal mesh for prolapse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
31
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only one patient (2.3%) was submitted to partial resection of the exposed mesh and primary suture of the vaginal margins. These data are in accordance to the literature, that range from 5 to 15% (17,19,21,22). The main limit of the present study was that it was performed in a single center and did not have an independent examiner during objective evaluations at the postoperatory period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Only one patient (2.3%) was submitted to partial resection of the exposed mesh and primary suture of the vaginal margins. These data are in accordance to the literature, that range from 5 to 15% (17,19,21,22). The main limit of the present study was that it was performed in a single center and did not have an independent examiner during objective evaluations at the postoperatory period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…15 Other RCTs have demonstrated slightly higher mesh removal rates, ranging from 5-9%. 18,20 We were pleased to find that mesh removal rates among patients with Medicare coverage were not higher than those reported in the literature, as claims-based outcomes assessments are often inferior to those of published clinical series. [21][22] Like Altman's study, we found a higher rate of bleeding in the mesh cohort.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Other randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown better anatomical results with mesh compared with non-mesh, though this finding has not been consistent. [16][17][18][19][20]10 Though reoperation is a surrogate for a symptomatic recurrence, it likely represents only a fraction of those women with recurrent prolapse.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A histerectomia por via vaginal utilizando garrote elástico foi descrita por Huaixan et al (2011) com sucesso em todos os animais submetidos ao procedimento e atendidos no Hospital Veterinário de Grandes Animais da Universidade de Brasília, Brasil . Em mulheres, estudos têm sido feitos para realizar a reparação e a colocação de enxertos ou biomateriais que possibilitem a manutenção do órgão para minimização dos prejuízos reprodutivos (Cervigni et al 2011, Huang et al 2012, Reid 2011, Sokol et al 2012, Wang et al 2011. Entre os pesquisadores ainda há divergência sobre a utilização dos biomateriais, pois alguns observaram altos índices de recidiva dos prolapsos quando da utilização destes enquanto outros observaram taxas altas de sucesso com a técnica (Cervigni et al 2011, Huang et al 2012, Sokol et al 2012.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified