The current grid code in China in regard to solar forecasting is, in my opinion, underdeveloped, especially in contrast to the rate at which photovoltaics are being installed. As such, explaining the limitations of the grid code and resetting pathways to improve it are thought utilitarian for those scientists and policymakers who are responsible for or aware of the grid code but have not themselves worked on the problem of forecasting. In this perspective article, I should first explain with respect to China's grid code the perceived deficiencies in the current forecasting research and practices, and then outline a five-stage workflow that could completely mitigate the situation. Among other things, the over-reliance on accuracy as the basis for gauging the goodness of forecasts is identified as a root cause for the status quo, and thus, I advocate a holistic forecast verification procedure that encompasses consistency, quality, and value. With that in mind, the proposed workflow for better solar forecasting for grid integration purposes relies on the effective information flow among the weather department, grid operators, and individual plant owners, which is inline with the current grid code. What goes beyond this is that the proposal further introduces a couple of concepts called “hierarchical reconciliation” and “firm forecasting,” which are new but are able to eliminate forecast errors wholly, thus making solar power dispatchable on the system level. With a slight premium incurred, it is now possible to manage solar plants, or variable renewables in general, in the same style as managing conventional fire-powered generators.