2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42089-9_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontology Evaluation Approaches: A Case Study from Agriculture Domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, it is applied in transversal studies to describe an object, phenomenon, or situation in order to define it or delimit it. This is especially useful when it is very complicated to describe the question, or when evidence is insufficient, not published, excessive or controversial, requiring the interpretation of experts in the subject [21]. In both cases, the Delphi method compares and combines individual opinions and arguments gathered from experts and enables decisions to be taken [22].…”
Section: Delphi Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it is applied in transversal studies to describe an object, phenomenon, or situation in order to define it or delimit it. This is especially useful when it is very complicated to describe the question, or when evidence is insufficient, not published, excessive or controversial, requiring the interpretation of experts in the subject [21]. In both cases, the Delphi method compares and combines individual opinions and arguments gathered from experts and enables decisions to be taken [22].…”
Section: Delphi Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that the ontology does not contain elements outside of the considered context and that the ontology schema is correctly designed. The reason for that is ontology was initially modeled as a domain ontology under the guidance of domain experts to provide relevant information to farmers in Sri Lanka [13], [29]. However, when considering the knowledge base level, the coverage of relationships between individuals (i.e., Recall(OIR, FIR) = 0.44) in a specified context is considerably low.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the gathered CQs were converted into the axioms in First-Order Logic and modeled the ontology accordingly [13]. At the end of the development, as usual, the quality of the content was evaluated by analyzing the answers of CQs provided through the ontology with the support of domain experts [29]. In addition to that, the quality of the structure was assessed using the OOPs web-based tool [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, according to the current literature [55], there is no agreement on a methodology for validation of ontologies. The choice of a suitable approach depends on the purpose of validation, the application in which the ontology is to be used, and on what aspect of the ontology we are trying to validate and evaluate [56]. For all these reasons, we have chosen to evaluate the BNO ontology by following different validation approaches.…”
Section: Ontology Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%