2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open access high-resolution 3D morphology models of cat, gerbil, rabbit, rat and human ossicular chains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Midway between the lateral process and the umbo, the manubrium separates slightly from the fibrous layer so that its only attachment is a fine fold of mucous membrane (Gulya and Schuknecht, 1995;Graham et al, 1978). This finding is confirmed by recent micro-CT measurements performed in our lab (Salih et al, 2011). Therefore, tympanic membrane motion was not constrained over the entire malleus handle connection, but only at the umbo and lateral process connections by means of a fully clamped boundary condition (see Fig.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelingsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Midway between the lateral process and the umbo, the manubrium separates slightly from the fibrous layer so that its only attachment is a fine fold of mucous membrane (Gulya and Schuknecht, 1995;Graham et al, 1978). This finding is confirmed by recent micro-CT measurements performed in our lab (Salih et al, 2011). Therefore, tympanic membrane motion was not constrained over the entire malleus handle connection, but only at the umbo and lateral process connections by means of a fully clamped boundary condition (see Fig.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelingsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Only one animal out of the five that we compared had somewhat smaller ossicles. Salih et al (2012) found a similarly small variability for three gerbils. ]…”
Section: Rigid-body Velocities In An Intrinsic Malleus-incus Referencmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The sensitivity analysis in this paper only considers the uncertainty in the material properties. Funnell and Decraemer (1996) showed that the TM shape also has a substantial effect on the responses, and the morphological variability of other components of the middle ear (e.g., Salih et al 2012) may also cause substantial differences in behaviour.…”
Section: Study Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%