Open innovation and collaboration: A systematic literature review

Meireles, Fernanda Rosalina da Silva; Azevedo, Ana Cláudia; Boaventura, João Maurício Gama

doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101702

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 79 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The concept of open innovation challenges the traditional closed model of innovation, which relies solely on internal research and development (R&D) efforts. Instead, it advocates for a more collaborative and inclusive approach to innovation, drawing on external sources such as customers, suppliers, partners, and even competitors (Meireles et al 2022). In summary, open innovation recognizes that valuable ideas and technologies are not solely confined within the boundaries of a single organization.…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Causes of Failure of Open Innovation Practices in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises

Almeida

2024

Administrative Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The adoption of open innovation poses significant challenges that are important to explore. Studies in this field have mainly focused on exploring the causes of the failure of open innovation among large companies. This study addresses this research gap by employing a sample of 297 Portuguese small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to explore, through a quantitative study, whether the dimensions and causes of failure differ between large organizations and SMEs. A total of seven dimensions of causes of failure are considered, including strategy-related, organizational structure, organizational culture, knowledge and intellectual property management, management skill and action, resources, and interfirm collaboration. The findings reveal significant differences in four of these seven dimensions: the main causes of failure are related to the resources and management processes of open innovation in SMEs, while large companies face more challenges in the organizational structure and culture components. This study offers theoretical insights into the gaps in the literature to better understand the challenges facing open innovation. Furthermore, this study offers practical guidelines for SMEs to identify and mitigate these main obstacles, promoting better innovation management practices.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Causes of Failure of Open Innovation Practices in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises

Almeida

2024

Administrative Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nagyobb ívű áttekintésekre (azaz nem valamilyen specifikus területet feldolgozó funkcionális innovációkkal foglalkozó irodalomfeldolgozásokra) nem bukkantunk. Számos szisztematikus irodalmi áttekintés foglalkozik kimondottan a hálózatos együttműködésekkel és az innovációs aktivitás szinergikus hatásaival (Zahoor et al, 2022), a nyílt innovációk irodalmának áttekintésével (Meireles et al, 2022;Neves et al, 2021;Ogink et al, 2022), a megosztásos gazdaság innovációs irodalmának bemutatásával (Belezas & Daniel, 2022), illetve az innovációs eredmények adaptálásával (van Oorschot et al, 2018).…”

Section: Néhány úJabb áLtalános Trendunclassified

Az innovációmenedzsment-kutatások térbeli és időbeli szerkezetének változása 1975 és 2021 között

Forman¹,

Kása²

2022

Külgazdaság

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Az innováció mára a gazdaság minden területén és az üzleti élet minden vonatkozásában megkerülhetetlenné vált. A termék- és folyamatfejlesztés, a piacbővítés és a fogyasztók hatékonyabb kielégítése mellett innovációnak tekinthető az új szabályoknak és előírásoknak való megfelelés, továbbá azok az operatív és stratégiai változtatások és fejlesztések, amelyek a szervezet és érintettjei számára bármilyen pozíciójavulással járnak. Jelen cikk témája bizonyítékok gyűjtése az innováció fogalmi bővülésére a szakirodalom minél szélesebb körű feltérképezésével és adatbányászati módszeren alapuló áttekintésével, illetve e fogalmi bővülés folyamatának a leírása. Ehhez a tudományos szakirodalomban 1975 és 2021 között megjelent mintegy 75 ezer cikket vetettek alá a szerzők az általuk kifejlesztett algoritmusnak, hogy a címekben és absztraktokban szereplő szavak, szókapcsolatok kinyerésével egyrészt időbeli tendenciákat lehessen azonosítani, másrészt a szerzők kutatóhelyi adataiból a térbeli átrendeződés trendjeit is láthatóvá lehessen tenni. A kutatás egyik fő következtetése, hogy az innováció értelmezésében egyre inkább a holisztikus megközelítések kerülnek előtérbe: az innováció mára már nem csupán egy funkcionális vállalati területen végrehajtott fejlesztés, hanem a vállalat határain messze túlnyúló komplex megközelítés a fenntarthatóbb jólét irányába.

show abstract

“…Subprograms receiving public support at the national level further underscore the commitment to nurturing innovation. However, despite these efforts, companies encounter notable challenges when seeking public support for innovation, including bureaucratic hurdles, complex application processes, and uncertainties surrounding funding availability and allocation [10][11][12]. Addressing these barriers is crucial to maximizing the impact of public-support initiatives and unleashing the full potential of innovation across sectors and regions [1][2][3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Companies that actively engage in collaborative partnerships, knowledge sharing, and technology transfer are more likely to receive public support. These companies recognize the importance of collaborative networks, leverage external expertise, and actively contribute to the wider innovation ecosystem [11]. By fostering an open innovation culture and demonstrating a willingness to share knowledge, they contribute to the collective progress and benefit from increased opportunities for public support [9,11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…No less important is collaboration between companies and other organizations, and companies that engage in collaborative activities and promote knowledge exchange are often more successful in securing public support for innovation [57]. Collaboration can occur through partnerships with other companies, universities, research institutions, and government agencies, and companies that actively engage in open innovation platforms are more likely to receive public support due to their commitment to collaborative innovation practices [11,57].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of the Profile of Portuguese Companies That Receive Public Support for Innovation: National Support vs. European Support

Rosário,

Varum,

Botelho

2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Innovation has emerged as the key driver of economic growth, technological advancement, and societal well-being. Recognizing the significance of fostering innovation, governments and policymakers worldwide have increasingly emphasized the need for public support to bolster the innovation ecosystem. This article explores the crucial importance of public support for innovation and delves into the characteristics of companies that receive such support. Based on the Community Innovation Survey of 2014, 2016, and 2018, information was compiled from 1857 companies. Of these companies, common to these 6 years of information, 755 received national support for innovation and 490 received European support. Based on these data, the main objective was to identify and distinguish the characteristics of Portuguese companies that receive European support and national support for innovation. To achieve this objective, logit models were estimated using Stata software. The results suggest that national support favors companies that belong to sectors with greater technological development, which develop new products and processes. Companies that establish cooperation agreements and that belong to groups of companies are also preferred for national support. In turn, of the companies that received European support, it appears that there is less differentiation in preference for the level of technological development. Companies that invest internally in R&D and that establish cooperation agreements for innovation are more likely to obtain European support, as are companies that have a higher proportion of workers with higher education. Finally, both national and European support favor companies with a greater volume of business from foreign markets.

show abstract

Open innovation and collaboration: A systematic literature review

Cited by 9 publications

References 79 publications

Causes of Failure of Open Innovation Practices in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises

Causes of Failure of Open Innovation Practices in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises

Az innovációmenedzsment-kutatások térbeli és időbeli szerkezetének változása 1975 és 2021 között

Comparison of the Profile of Portuguese Companies That Receive Public Support for Innovation: National Support vs. European Support

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About