2014
DOI: 10.1177/1758573214536535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open reduction and fixation of displaced lateral clavicle fractures using the Minimally Invasive Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction (MINAR®) technique: a case series review

Abstract: The MINAR is reproducible and safe when treating lateral end of clavicle fractures. We consider that, over the short- to mid-term, it achieves results equivalent to those for other implants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al used titanium cable in a minimally invasive technique 10 . Kenyon et al used an orthocord suture and two flip tacks to reconstruct the coracoclavicular ligaments via a minimally invasive approach 11 . Both groups reported favorable outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Li et al used titanium cable in a minimally invasive technique 10 . Kenyon et al used an orthocord suture and two flip tacks to reconstruct the coracoclavicular ligaments via a minimally invasive approach 11 . Both groups reported favorable outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For hook plate, which used to be widely accepted as a proper implant hardware for dislocation of acromioclavicular joint and distal clavicle fracture, may bring some annoying complications, such as rotator cuff injury, acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis, acromial fracture and hook cutout, and clavicle fracture at the medial end of the plate, which usually required a secondary surgery to remove the implanted hardware within a short period or even a secondary revision operation [4][5][6][7][8][9] . While titanium alloy cable or orthocord suture might cure most of the fractures, they could leave some deformities and complications due to not anatomically reducing the fracture and the long-term cutting effect of the materials 10,11 . For distal clavicular plate alone, patients might face the potential risks of the screw detachment and plate back-out, which can lead to loss of reduction, malunion or non-union, etc., which can eventually result in the failure of the treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%