Open versus closed surgical exposure of canine teeth that are displaced in the roof of the mouth

Parkin, Nicola; Benson, Philip; Thind, Bikram; Shah, Asad Hussain; Khalil, Ismail; Ghafoor, Saiba

doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006966.pub3

Cited by 36 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…6 We used the closed eruption technique as Wisthet al 7 suggested that a closed surgical exposure of a palatally displaced canine (PDC) leads to better periodontal outcomes than an open surgical exposure. A systematic review by Parkinet al 8 found no evidence of the superiority in terms of clinical attachment levels after treatment with one technique over the other.…”

Section: Discussion:-mentioning

confidence: 99%

Management of Palatally Impacted Canine Using Ballista Spring: A Case Report

Amit¹,

Gupta²,

Yadav³

et al. 2020

IJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Maxillary canine impaction is a commonly seen condition which is always challenging to the orthodontist to bring the tooth to the normal position and finish the case with proper canine class-I relationship. The "ballista spring system" has some advantages over the previously proposed systems described by different technique by different authors. Since the upper canines are the most frequently impacted teeth with which orthodontists are concerned, the purpose of this article is to describe and discuss a relatively technical approach to the orthodontic extrusion of impacted canine teeth using ballista spring.

show abstract

Section: Discussion:-mentioning

confidence: 99%

Management of Palatally Impacted Canine Using Ballista Spring: A Case Report

Amit¹,

Gupta²,

Yadav³

et al. 2020

IJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…7-1). 16 [19][20][21] Closed eruption technique has been much criticized regarding the direction of tooth eruption (direction of force) and its deleterious effects (root resorption of lateral incisor). 7-1; Fig.…”

Section: Biomechanical Considerationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biomechanics-Based Management of Impacted Canines

Yadav¹,

Nanda²

2015

Esthetics and Biomechanics in Orthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…USCAR et al, 2017. Moreover, in more severe and rare cases, cysts and tumors may be formed, which would result in greater bone loss and even tooth loss (PARKIN et al, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Segmented mechanics for traction of impacted maxillary canine: case report with a 3-year follow-up

Lima¹,

Costa²,

Barbosa³

et al. 2019

Biosci. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Young patients are increasingly concerned with smile aesthetics, resulting in the early visit to the dental office. It is of great importance that professionals such as orthodontists, pediatric dentists, and general practitioners are aware of the potential changes in positioning and development that may compromise aesthetics, considering they may prevent future complex orthodontic treatments. This case report describes the treatment of a patient aged 9 years and 4 months, who complained at assessment about the size and position of maxillary incisors. Clinically, the patient presented atresic maxilla and eruption of teeth 12 and 22. The poor positioning of tooth 22 alerted for the potential retention of tooth 23. A two-phase treatment was proposed, including an intercepting phase and a corrective phase. In the intercepting phase, rapid maxillary expansion (RME) was performed, which increased the room for eruption of tooth 23 and prevented the collapse of tooth 22. After the activation period, the Haas expander was locked and removed six months later. Twenty-five months after the removal, the second phase started with fixed corrective orthodontics and traction of tooth 23, for which the enamel was drilled and traction was performed using the segmented technique with a 0.019" x 0.025" Titanium Molybdenum Alloy (TMA) cantilever and anchorage in passive transpalatal arch (PTA). The use of this technique minimizes the side effects on the teeth adjacent to tooth 23 and enamel drilling prevents potential losses of the traction device by detachment. After 4 months of segmented mechanics, the devices were removed and the PTA was maintained. Twenty-six months later, the patient was 14 years and 4 months old, presenting direct subdivision Class III molar relationship, upper and lower crowding, and unsatisfactory relationship between bone bases due to the excessive mandibular growth. A new RME was performed, and after 3 months a Capelozza Pattern III fixed appliance was installed in the lower arch. Additionally, an upper fixed appliance was installed after the RME retention period. One year and 4 months later, the appliances were removed and a maxillary Hawley plate was installed with a 0.6-mm fixed mandibular intercanine arch. The follow-up lasted 3 years and 4 months and the results were maintained, preserving the occlusal and facial characteristics.

show abstract

Open versus closed surgical exposure of canine teeth that are displaced in the roof of the mouth

Cited by 36 publications

References 29 publications

Management of Palatally Impacted Canine Using Ballista Spring: A Case Report

Management of Palatally Impacted Canine Using Ballista Spring: A Case Report

Biomechanics-Based Management of Impacted Canines

Segmented mechanics for traction of impacted maxillary canine: case report with a 3-year follow-up

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About