Opportunities and pitfalls of using building performance simulation in explorative R&D contexts

Abstract

One of the promising use cases of building performance simulation (BPS) is its role as a virtual laboratory in research and development (R&D) projects that aim to bring innovative building components from initial idea towards market introduction. By facilitating what-if explorations and whole-building insights, BPS can create complementary value, alongside actual experiments. However, explorative R&D projects tend to be rather erratic and are more ill-defined than typical BPS tasks. This raises several issues concerning application, interpretation and communication of BPS-based performance predictions in explorative contexts. The aim of this paper is to highlight opportunities and potential pitfalls of the use of BPS in this application domain. First, the characteristic properties of exploration-driven R&D projects are contrasted with more conventional BPS projects using a systematic requirements engineering approach. Then, the process and outcomes of three R&D projects of innovative façade systems are discussed. Finally, the lessons learned from these studies are presented.

Comparative Building Energy Simulation Study of Static and Thermochromically Adaptive Energy-Efficient Glazing in Various Climate Regions

“…Several modelling studies have shown that energy performance simulations can quite accurately depict the energy consumption of buildings, and can have a significant impact on designing new materials to optimize the energy performance [28][29][30]. Nevertheless, it is important that modeling parameters are defined and documented precisely, to prevent pitfalls and to ensure comparability between the studied systems, as well as between different studies.…”

“…Furthermore, we have deducted several other parameters that are important to ensure comparability and convey the full energy reduction potential of thermochromic windows to the glazing industry and the general public: i) when thermochromic windows are compared to commercially available energy-efficient glazing solutions, systems with similar visible transmission have to be compared; ii) for better comparison with commercial products, G and U-values [31,32] need to be reported; iii) to grasp the full potential of thermochromic windows, the switching temperature has to be optimized for each system individually. Further, most modeling studies on thermochromic windows focus on the energy reduction potential in office buildings [23- Several modelling studies have shown that energy performance simulations can quite accurately depict the energy consumption of buildings, and can have a significant impact on designing new materials to optimize the energy performance [28][29][30]. Nevertheless, it is important that modeling parameters are defined and documented precisely, to prevent pitfalls and to ensure comparability between the studied systems, as well as between different studies.…”

A review on indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and energy consumption in building based on occupant behavior

“…Estimating the amount of energy consumption and designing the HVAC system is the most common usage of simulations. In some studies IEQ aspects are considered on the basis of temperature set points and ventilation rate (Loonen et al , 2015). There are different developed computational models for simulating each IEQ aspect (Zhang and Chen, 2009; Hensen and Lamberts, 2011; Vorländer, 2013).…”

Adaptive building envelope simulation in current design practice: findings from interviews with practitioners about their understanding of methods, tools and workarounds and implications for future tool developments

“…control) beyond what is possible by simple scripting approaches. In design practice, this often creates a need for workarounds (Loonen, de Klijn-Chevalerias, and Hensen 2019) that quite often result in unintended and undesirable modelling artifacts.…”