“…In rapidly short order, the library literature has gone from suggesting that acquisitions or collection development will, could, or should be part of the future of ILL (Alder 2007;Chadwell 2009;Egan 2007;Hodges, Preston, and Hamilton 2010;McHone-Chase 2010;Murphy and Rupp-Serrano 1999;Oberlander 2006;Posner 2007;Reighart and Oberlander 2008;Richey 2010;Watson 2004) to asserting that PDA and purchase-on-demand (POD)-style programs have largely proven themselves and are well on their way toward becoming advisable, established, necessary, standard, and/or "more sane" practice (Anderson 2010;Dillon 2011;Fischer et al 2012; Hussong-Christian and Goergen-Doll 2010b; Jones 2011; Levine-Clark 2011; Miller 2011; Nixon et al 2010; Schroeder 2012; Tyler 2011; Way and Garrison 2011). There certainly seems to be evidence for a burgeoning widespread adoption of PDA for print materials, for although long-established programs are still somewhat uncommon, pilot and test programs, as well as libraries on the verge of launching them, appear to be legion (Carlisle Fountain and Frederiksen 2010; Lenares and Delquie 2010; Osorio 2011; Wexelbaum and Heinrich 2011).…”