1984
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030536010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optic Nerve Head Drusen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, deep and hidden drusen can be difficult to differentiate from true papillary oedema. Several diagnostic methods for ODD have been described: exploration of the eye fundus [9], autofluorescence [10], fluorescein angiography [11], ocular ultrasound [12], computed tomography [13] and, more recently, optical coherence tomography [14,15]. Since its emergence in the early 1980s, B-scan echography has been considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of ODD [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…However, deep and hidden drusen can be difficult to differentiate from true papillary oedema. Several diagnostic methods for ODD have been described: exploration of the eye fundus [9], autofluorescence [10], fluorescein angiography [11], ocular ultrasound [12], computed tomography [13] and, more recently, optical coherence tomography [14,15]. Since its emergence in the early 1980s, B-scan echography has been considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of ODD [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…Various ancillary tests, including B-scan ultrasonography, 55; 105; 151; 168 fundus autofluorescence, 95; 140; 145 orbital computed tomography (CT) scan, 12; 131; 162 fluorescein angiography (FA), 24; 159; 177 scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, 75; 103; 187 electrophysiology, 17; 18; 23; 142; 186 and more recently optical coherence tomography (OCT), 31; 88; 112; 125; 215 have been used to identify optic disc drusen. These tests may be less useful in children who typically have buried drusen that are more difficult to detect.…”
Section: Diagnostic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12; 82; 105; 131; 162; 217 Like B-scan ultrasonography, CT detects calcification of drusen. It is limited by the 1.5 mm thickness of slices, which may miss drusen, and has been shown to be inferior to ultrasonography.…”
Section: Diagnostic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%