2019
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648x/ab47b3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical absorption of single-layer hexagonal boron nitride in the ultraviolet

Abstract: In this paper we theoretically describe the absorption of hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) single layer. We develop the necessary formalism and present an efficient method for solving the Wannier equation for excitons. We give predictions for the absorption of hBN on quartz and on graphite. We compare our predictions with recently published results [Elias et al., Nat. Comm. 10, 2639] for a monolayer of hBN on graphite. The spontaneous radiative lifetime of excitons in hBN is also computed. We argue that the optic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
7
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8b, which depicts the changes both in the optical ΔE opt = E 0 (ε m ) − E 0 (ε m = 1) and QP ΔE QP ¼ Σ xc 0;þ ðε m Þ À Σ xc 0;þ ðε m ¼ 1Þ gaps. Here, E 0 is the ground-state exciton energy, and Σ xc 0;þ accounts for the exchange-correlation function 191 . More details are presented in the Supplemental Material.…”
Section: Dielectric Screening and Many-body Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8b, which depicts the changes both in the optical ΔE opt = E 0 (ε m ) − E 0 (ε m = 1) and QP ΔE QP ¼ Σ xc 0;þ ðε m Þ À Σ xc 0;þ ðε m ¼ 1Þ gaps. Here, E 0 is the ground-state exciton energy, and Σ xc 0;þ accounts for the exchange-correlation function 191 . More details are presented in the Supplemental Material.…”
Section: Dielectric Screening and Many-body Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, and contrary to Ref. [23], we opt to work with a Slater basis instead of a Gaussian one since this choice allows us to obtain more accurate results using fewer terms in Eq. (7).…”
Section: Model Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, small differences in the values of absorption coefficient do not significantly affect the overall estimation of the κ and g. Hence, our assumption is reasonably acceptable.) [9,[12][13][14] ( ) W m -2 = 34.630 × 10 7 W m -2…”
Section: S10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To note that small differences in the values of absorption coefficient do not significantly affect the overall estimation of the κ and g. Hence, our assumption is reasonably acceptable. )[9,[12][13][14] ( ) W m -2 = 18.550 × 10 7 W m-2 Similarly, for 20× the peak absorbed laser power per unit area (q2 ): where, = Total absorbed laser power = Laser spot radius for 20× objective S11 = Optical absorption coefficient = 0.038 ( ) W m -2 = 15.019 × 10 7 W m -2 Thickness ( ) of the BG heterostructure = (3.4+0.335) nm = 3.735 nm (It is approximately considered as the sum of the 11 layers: one monolayer of graphene and 10 layers of h-BN).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%