“…Some instruments use their own proprietary software, these include Cirrus (AngioPlex software, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA, USA), [ 5 , 10 ] AngioVue software (Optovue, Inc., Fremont, CA, USA), [ 11 , 12 ] and RS -3000 Advance (Nidek, Gamagori, Japan). [ 6 ] In the majority of the studies, however, images are exported and post-processed with a variety of different thresholding methods, including fixed cutoffs, [ 13 – 15 ] dynamic cutoff (e.g., mean, [ 9 , 16 , 17 ] ImageJ [National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD] default algorithm, [ 18 ] Otsu’s algorithm), [ 19 , 20 ] prototype software, [ 21 , 22 ] and more complex methods combining preprocessing filters and multilevel thresholds strategies. [ 23 – 26 ] It is still uncertain whether different algorithms lead to the same or, at least, similar results and findings from many studies could have been influenced by the algorithm utilized.…”