“…An important question is whether angiography is actually needed and to what extent can OCT replace fluorescein angiography and ICGA in AMD. 22,23 A recent study found that OCT, despite being safer, more convenient, and less costly, cannot totally replace FA because there is a substantial disagreement between OCT and FA findings in detecting active disease in patients with neovascular AMD who are being monitored, and that both modalities may be needed to comprehensively monitor patients. 23 The primary reason for the current trend of increasing use of OCT and decreasing use of FA and ICGA in clinical practice is the noninvasiveness and rapid acquisition provided by the former technology in comparison to the opposite for the latter.…”