2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2009.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical coupling between two nanobelts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At both wavelengths, the coupling efficiency is weakly dependent on gap separations <10 nm but there is a pronounced drop in light transfer from 10 to 50 nm similarly to other coupled optical systems such as belt WGs and microresonators. 25,34 The coupling of 450 nm light shows a decay of 1.6−1.8%/nm (ca. 0.10 dB/nm) that translates to a lower limit of 2 nm for the distance sensitivity of the device.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At both wavelengths, the coupling efficiency is weakly dependent on gap separations <10 nm but there is a pronounced drop in light transfer from 10 to 50 nm similarly to other coupled optical systems such as belt WGs and microresonators. 25,34 The coupling of 450 nm light shows a decay of 1.6−1.8%/nm (ca. 0.10 dB/nm) that translates to a lower limit of 2 nm for the distance sensitivity of the device.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is anticipated that the coupling between high-index contrast WGs would be strongly dependent on the separation between WGs, leading to significant optical modulation in the WG outputs when the WGs move apart by only a few nanometers. , To better understand light propagation and the decay of the optical field residing near the surface of dielectric WGs, we have fabricated nanofiber junctions and studied the power transfer occurring between coupled WGs as a function of coupling angle, gap separation, guided wavelength, and chemical stimulus. The approach involves cross-coupling nanofiber WGs with shallow coupling angles of ∼30° to produce small overlapping areas of <0.07 μm 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%