2021
DOI: 10.1080/00295639.2021.1968223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Batch Size Growth for Wielandt Method and Superhistory Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, some methods need a vast footprint, and some are only suited for nuclear systems with regular shapes, which eliminates the MC method's advantage in free 3D modeling. The second kind is independent of space meshing, including the Wielandt's method (Yamamoto and Miyoshi, 2004;Brown, 2007;She et al, 2015;Pan et al, 2022c), the superhistory method (Brissenden and Garlick, 1986;She et al, 2015;Mickus and Dufek, 2018;Pan et al, 2022c), the neutron population growth method (Mickus and Dufek, 2018;Pan et al, 2022a), and the source extrapolation method (Pan et al, 2022b). Wielandt's method is based on the shifted inverse power method (Bronson et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, some methods need a vast footprint, and some are only suited for nuclear systems with regular shapes, which eliminates the MC method's advantage in free 3D modeling. The second kind is independent of space meshing, including the Wielandt's method (Yamamoto and Miyoshi, 2004;Brown, 2007;She et al, 2015;Pan et al, 2022c), the superhistory method (Brissenden and Garlick, 1986;She et al, 2015;Mickus and Dufek, 2018;Pan et al, 2022c), the neutron population growth method (Mickus and Dufek, 2018;Pan et al, 2022a), and the source extrapolation method (Pan et al, 2022b). Wielandt's method is based on the shifted inverse power method (Bronson et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%