2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal conditions for flexible methane production in a demand-based operation of biogas plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to determine the main factors restricting the NPV of the DO mechanism, sensitivity analysis was further conducted by varying the uncertain input parameters of the co-digestion ceteris paribus within a 10% interval (Hahn et al, 2014a). The flexibility (defined as the ratio of biogas compensating for peak load electricity demand phase to the base load continuous biogas production), co-digestion facilities investments, feeding OLR of substrates, real biogas production amount and labour salary are selected as the key parameters for representing the possible uncertain factors that have direct impacts on the economic benefits of the proposed system (Laperrière et al, 2017). The extent of the variation of the output (NPV of system) indicates the risk potential of each parameter on the economic benefits of the sewage plant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to determine the main factors restricting the NPV of the DO mechanism, sensitivity analysis was further conducted by varying the uncertain input parameters of the co-digestion ceteris paribus within a 10% interval (Hahn et al, 2014a). The flexibility (defined as the ratio of biogas compensating for peak load electricity demand phase to the base load continuous biogas production), co-digestion facilities investments, feeding OLR of substrates, real biogas production amount and labour salary are selected as the key parameters for representing the possible uncertain factors that have direct impacts on the economic benefits of the proposed system (Laperrière et al, 2017). The extent of the variation of the output (NPV of system) indicates the risk potential of each parameter on the economic benefits of the sewage plant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example studies (Barchmann et al, 2016; Feng et al, 2018; Mauky et al, 2015) used cow manure and corn silage as substrates for AD to produce biogas on demand. Laperrière et al (2017) further used corn silage, carrots and glycerol; Ahmed et al (2017) adopted sugar beet silage and grass silage as substrates for co-digestion. These studies confirmed the suitability of selected agricultural wastes for using as regulatory substrates to regulate the biogas supply.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shortfall of the model has also to be considered in the case of flexible biogas production. Even though limitations to variable gas productions have been considered in the dispatch model according to Mauky et al () and Laperrière et al (), constraints for gradients and temporally high OLR are not modelled and might therefore overestimate the potential of flexible gas production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digestate from three different origins were sampled from pilot-scale, solid-state mesophilic anaerobic digesters that had been operated under identical environmental conditions for 1.5 years [ 12 ]. One anaerobic digester received readily biodegradable substrates (grass and carrots), the second digester received intermediately biodegradable substrate (grass and manure) and the third digester received slowly biodegradable substrates (manure and dung).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%