1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf01436967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimale Approximation linearer Funktionale auf periodischen Funktionen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

1976
1976
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these results are contained in [7] and [8], but short proofs are given here for completeness. Throughout this paper we shall assume that pj4=O,j=O, 1 ..... k-1, so that 5{k is of dimension k. For f, geC2,, let…”
Section: The Orthogonal Basismentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some of these results are contained in [7] and [8], but short proofs are given here for completeness. Throughout this paper we shall assume that pj4=O,j=O, 1 ..... k-1, so that 5{k is of dimension k. For f, geC2,, let…”
Section: The Orthogonal Basismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This example is taken from [7]. The values of pj and 2.,j were computed using 3 terms in the series of (6.8) and (6.9).…”
Section: "Nkf= ~ (F Ej> Ej+ Omkfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors of [1], [4], [5] have treated the above problem in different ways for some special cases relative to either the functional L or a space setting and nodal location in the complex region of that space. In this paper, the common linear algebra background for the results of the abovementioned articles will be treated and additional results given.…”
Section: K(xy) = ~N_opm(x)p~(y) X Y E B mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context we recall the method proposed by Kress [9] and Knauff-Kress [8] to define function spaces of the considered type with the aid of area or contour integrals. As an example let E be the space of periodic functions, holomorphic in a We point to the fact that (5.12) rW(a) * í 0, iiiGZ\{0}, in contrast to the values given in [3] and [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%