Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3240323.3240349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimally balancing receiver and recommended users' importance in reciprocal recommender systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Shani et al [ 25 ] casted the recommendation problem as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) such that the long-term effects of each recommendation could be considered and the expected returns could be optimized. Similar optimization approaches have been proposed for movie recommendations [ 26 , 27 ], nutrition [ 28 ] and online dating [ 29 , 30 ], to name a few. To the best of our knowledge, none of the above works have addressed the domain specific challenges associated with medical assignments such as the time-sensitive nature of the process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Shani et al [ 25 ] casted the recommendation problem as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) such that the long-term effects of each recommendation could be considered and the expected returns could be optimized. Similar optimization approaches have been proposed for movie recommendations [ 26 , 27 ], nutrition [ 28 ] and online dating [ 29 , 30 ], to name a few. To the best of our knowledge, none of the above works have addressed the domain specific challenges associated with medical assignments such as the time-sensitive nature of the process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the introduction of RCF, a number of improvements to the system, or alternative hybrid RRSs have been designed. Kleinerman et al designed a modification to RCF to account for user popularity [2] and also tested explanations for the recommendations made by RCF, finding that users provided with explanations for their recommendations were more likely to use them [3]. Neve et al designed a collaborative filtering algorithm based on latent factors, and found that this improved on the efficiency of RCF on large datasets [22].…”
Section: Reciprocal Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Success based on matches would not be achieved by recommending the top users on the service, as these users match with a very small percentage of their recommendations, so even if it achieved one-way success, it would not generate a high precision in this evaluation. In order to ensure fairness, it would be straightforward to apply existing reciprocal methods such as [2].…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Für eine möglichst realitätsnahe Betrachtung der Interaktionen von Plattform zu Nutzer und Nutzer zu Nutzer werden in Abbildung 1 die in der Simulation betrachteten relevanten Attribute und Methoden der einzelnen Akteure dargestellt. Die Nutzer der Plattform werden durch persönliche, plattformunabhängige Attribute (1) und plattformbasierte Attribute charakterisiert (2,3). Initialisiert werden die plattformunabhängigen Attribute anhand der Profilbild-Studie 2019/2020 [27].…”
Section: Abbildung 1 Statisches Systemverhaltenunclassified