2019
DOI: 10.3897/nucet.5.33981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization models of a two-component nuclear energy system with thermal and fast reactors in a closed nuclear fuel cycle

Abstract: The article presents a description and some illustrative results of the application of two optimization models for a two-component nuclear energy system consisting of thermal and fast reactors in a closed nuclear fuel cycle. These models correspond to two possible options of developing Russian nuclear energy system, which are discussed in the expert community: (1) thermal and fast reactors utilizing uranium and mixed oxide fuel, (2) thermal reactors utilizing uranium oxide fuel and fast reactors utilizing mixe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MESSAGE model is relevant to this study because of its extensive application in studying the consequences of alternative lines of action and alternative sets of constraints on energy supply decisions. MES-SAGE is a widely used model as one of the best optimization tools, and, for many national energy optimization analyses [32,33]. Additionally, IIASA (2020) revealed that scenarios developed with the MESSAGE model have been used in the assessments and special reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and most recently the Global Energy Assessment (GEA) [34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MESSAGE model is relevant to this study because of its extensive application in studying the consequences of alternative lines of action and alternative sets of constraints on energy supply decisions. MES-SAGE is a widely used model as one of the best optimization tools, and, for many national energy optimization analyses [32,33]. Additionally, IIASA (2020) revealed that scenarios developed with the MESSAGE model have been used in the assessments and special reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and most recently the Global Energy Assessment (GEA) [34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was assumed that the cooling time of spent fuel for all the reactor types before reprocessing would be 5 years, and reprocessing would be done on a centralised basis. The separated plutonium accumulated by 2020 (ex-weapon and reactor-grade plutonium) and plutonium contained in spent fuel are resources for producing nuclear fuel for SFR and VVERm(mox) (relevant data on stocks were taken from [5]).…”
Section: Scenario Assumptions and Initial Data Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the content of U-233 per assembly will be about 20 kg. It was previously estimated that the content of U-232 could reach ~1% in U-233 produced in the thorium blanket of a thermonuclear facility by irradiating thorium for ~500 days (Orlov et al 1979, Kulikov et al 2016, 2020a, 2020b, Andrianov et al 2019. In this case, the assembly will contain about 0.2 kg of U-232 (Shieff et al 1977, Krumbein et al 1980.…”
Section: Creating a Protective Gamma-barrier For Uranium Containing U...mentioning
confidence: 99%