2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of GATE and PHITS Monte Carlo code parameters for spot scanning proton beam based on simulation with FLUKA general-purpose code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This underestimation at small ranges and less underestimation toward the end of the range is consistent with the simulations using the non‐divergent beam in our study. Similar conclusions were found on the Geant4 MCS in an independent study …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This underestimation at small ranges and less underestimation toward the end of the range is consistent with the simulations using the non‐divergent beam in our study. Similar conclusions were found on the Geant4 MCS in an independent study …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similar conclusions were found on the Geant4 MCS in an independent study. 35 The lateral dose profiles agreed qualitatively well in the halo region in the open beam configuration but was substantially overestimated when traversing the RaShi. Due to the shallow gradient of the lateral dose profile in the halo after traversing the RaShi, FWxM parameters were considerably overestimated although OFs could be rather well reproduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…It can deal with the transport of all particles over wide energy ranges, using several nuclear reaction models, and nuclear data libraries. It has been previously compared with other Monte Carlo code (e.g., FLUKA) and confirmed its effectiveness [11]. Our simulation focused on the effects of particle scattering and nuclear reaction, and it did not consider the differences between Hparticles and protons.…”
Section: Nuclear Reaction In Stripper Foil Simulated Using Phits Codementioning
confidence: 60%
“…In this model, the participating particles, that is, primary particles or particles generated during the cascade process, are described by means of Gaussian wave functions. Also, a range cut of 1 mm and a step size of 0.1 mm were applied, which is sufficiently small as demonstrated in several studies …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, a range cut of 1 mm and a step size of 0.1 mm were applied, which is sufficiently small as demonstrated in several studies. [33][34][35]…”
Section: C Geant4 Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%