2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10706-021-01994-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Multi-additives for Expansive Soil Improvement Using Response Surface Methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2(B), (D), and (F) shows the contour patterns of factors A and B, A and C, and B and C, and the contour plot of D shows a circle-like shape. Since the more circular shape of the contours indicates that the interaction between the two factors is not significant, [43][44][45] the interaction between B and C is not significant, which is consistent with the results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) as shown in Table S5. Figure 2(b) and (f) show that the contour plots are close to an ellipse, indicating that the interactions between A and B and B and C are significant; however, from Table S5, P(AB) > 0.05 and P(BC) > 0.05, which indicates that the interactions between A and B and B and C are not significant, and the results obtained from these two aspects contradict each other.…”
Section: Box-behnken Experimental Results Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Figure 2(B), (D), and (F) shows the contour patterns of factors A and B, A and C, and B and C, and the contour plot of D shows a circle-like shape. Since the more circular shape of the contours indicates that the interaction between the two factors is not significant, [43][44][45] the interaction between B and C is not significant, which is consistent with the results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) as shown in Table S5. Figure 2(b) and (f) show that the contour plots are close to an ellipse, indicating that the interactions between A and B and B and C are significant; however, from Table S5, P(AB) > 0.05 and P(BC) > 0.05, which indicates that the interactions between A and B and B and C are not significant, and the results obtained from these two aspects contradict each other.…”
Section: Box-behnken Experimental Results Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%