2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.09.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of petroleum refinery effluent treatment in a UASB reactor using response surface methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another approach, consistent with oil-degrading micro-organisms at the sea floor (Wardlaw et al 2008), may involve anaerobic digestion of oil-contaminated sorbent under optimized conditions (Alimahmoodi and Mulligan 2011;Ji et al 2011;Mohan et al 2011;Rastegar et al 2011;Scherr et al 2012). Given the potential benefits of such approaches, considerably more research will be needed in the future to more fully understand the processes, including the quantification of decomposition rates and the identification of chemical breakdown products.…”
Section: Composting and Anaerobic Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach, consistent with oil-degrading micro-organisms at the sea floor (Wardlaw et al 2008), may involve anaerobic digestion of oil-contaminated sorbent under optimized conditions (Alimahmoodi and Mulligan 2011;Ji et al 2011;Mohan et al 2011;Rastegar et al 2011;Scherr et al 2012). Given the potential benefits of such approaches, considerably more research will be needed in the future to more fully understand the processes, including the quantification of decomposition rates and the identification of chemical breakdown products.…”
Section: Composting and Anaerobic Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of two-factor interactions were investigated with one factor fixed at a high (+1) or low (−1) level while the other was varied (Gong et al 2010;Rastegar et al 2011). Figure SM-2 shows interaction plots, which indicate whether or not there was an interaction between the factors.…”
Section: Response Surface Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, y is the response, b 0 is the constant coefficient, X i (i = 1 -n) are non-coded variables, b i are the linear interaction coefficients, b ii are the quadratic interaction coefficients, b ij (i and j = 1 -n) are the second-order interaction coefficients, and e are residuals for each experiment (Rastegar et al 2011). Design-Expert 7.0 program (Version 7.0, Stat-Ease Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) was used for data processing with Eq.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%