2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of phosphorus removal from secondary effluent using simplex method in Tianjin, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is never achieved in practice and the actual ratio between aluminum dosed and phosphorus removed is always higher than 2 (De Hass, et al, 2000). Although the presently observed ratio of 2.3 mole of aluminum per mole of phosphorus was higher than theoretical calculation, it was comparatively lower than the value of 4.13 and 3 reported by Wang, et al, (2005) and Xie, et al, (2005), respectively, for the secondary treated wastewater. Table 1 presents data on treatment efficiency of aluminum at 2.3:1 mole ratio dosages.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is never achieved in practice and the actual ratio between aluminum dosed and phosphorus removed is always higher than 2 (De Hass, et al, 2000). Although the presently observed ratio of 2.3 mole of aluminum per mole of phosphorus was higher than theoretical calculation, it was comparatively lower than the value of 4.13 and 3 reported by Wang, et al, (2005) and Xie, et al, (2005), respectively, for the secondary treated wastewater. Table 1 presents data on treatment efficiency of aluminum at 2.3:1 mole ratio dosages.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Actually, phosphorus removal techniques fall into three main categories: physical, chemical and biological (Wang, et al, 2006). Among them, chemical removal techniques, using metal salts, are reliable and well-established processes (Yeoman, et al, 1988;Wang, et al, 2005 andLee, et al, 2003). Chemically, phosphate is most commonly removed by precipitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, a mol ratio of 2.2 of aluminum per 1 mol of phosphorus was used to bring down the effluent TP level in the range of 0.5~1.0 mg/L. It was higher than theoretical calculation but it was comparatively lower than the value of 4.13 and 3 reported by Wang et al [14] and Xie et al [15], respectively for the secondary treated wastewater. Nitrification rates based on ammonium consumed were calculated using the following equation [16]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Iron saturated residual dosages were held constant through the beginning of each spike addition until the phosphorus concentration of the clarified water de creased and stabilized. Residual dosages were then slight ly adjusted to bring the clarified wastewater phosphorus concentration back into the target range following optimization (Wang et al, 2005. This test illustrates the overall stability of the wastewater treatment method in handling increases in the initial wastewater phosphorus concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%