2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2019.103067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of processing parameters of laser skin welding in vitro combining the response surface methodology with NSGA- II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formulated multi-objective optimization (MOO) problem for the designed system is shown in Table 7. In this study, two important optimization objectives were studied using the genetic algorithm method (NSGA-Ⅱ) incorporated in Python: 1) maximization of hydrogen production yield and 2) maximization of output power (Li et al, 2019). Figure 8 depicts the Pareto frontier diagram of the optimal solution points of objective functions for the model.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formulated multi-objective optimization (MOO) problem for the designed system is shown in Table 7. In this study, two important optimization objectives were studied using the genetic algorithm method (NSGA-Ⅱ) incorporated in Python: 1) maximization of hydrogen production yield and 2) maximization of output power (Li et al, 2019). Figure 8 depicts the Pareto frontier diagram of the optimal solution points of objective functions for the model.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Maximum tensile strength (457MPa) was achieved for a combination of parameter namely laser power (500), travelling speed (300) and focal position (14). While minimum tensile strength (428MPa) was observed at laser power (400), travelling speed (600) and Focal position (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…And, response surface method is used to examine the relationship between one or more response variables and a set of quantitative experimental parameters. These methods are often employed after the important controllable factors have been identified and intend to find the factor setting that optimizes the response [14]. The threelevel response surface factorial design utilized in this study.…”
Section: Table 1 Chemical Composition Of Inconel 625 and Duplex Staimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, both MA and EV should be sufficient to achieve quantitative adsorption and elution of the analytes, respectively. The two factors (MA and EV) were further optimized using CCD to minimize the number of experiments and to investigate their interactions based on the quadratic model employed on response surface methodologies (RSM) (Li et al 2019).…”
Section: Optimization Of the Developed D-mspme Screening Of D-mspme P...mentioning
confidence: 99%