2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2015.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of relay selection and ergodic capacity in cognitive radio sensor networks with wireless energy harvesting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…g In addition to the convexity of problem (8), we can trivially verify that the slater's condition [14] for problem (8) holds. Therefore, we can achieve the optimal solution to problem (8) by solving its dual problem.…”
Section: Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…g In addition to the convexity of problem (8), we can trivially verify that the slater's condition [14] for problem (8) holds. Therefore, we can achieve the optimal solution to problem (8) by solving its dual problem.…”
Section: Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the interweave paradigm, secondary users (SUs) first harvest energy and then opportunistically access the licensed spectrum when primary users (PUs) are detected as inactive [4]- [7]. In the overlay paradigm, SUs use the harvested energy from the PU signal to forward the data of both PUs and SUs, provided that perfect cooperations between PUs and SUs [8]- [10] are assumed. In the underlay paradigm, SUs harvest energy from the RF signal of PUs or other SUs, and transmit with the harvested energy provided the interference to PUs is below a tolerable threshold [11]- [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [17], [18], throughput maximization is studied for the case that one SU harvests energy from ambient RF signals, serves as the relay for PUs, and communicates with another SU. After extending one SU to multiple SUs, relay selection to maximize throughput or sum-throughput is investigated in [19], [20], wherein SUs harvest from PUs or a hybrid access point (H-AP). In [21], sum-throughput maximization is studied for overlay EH-CRNs, wherein first H-AP performs WET for multiple SUs as well as information transmission for PUs, and then collects data from SUs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the coexistence paradigm, the existing works on RF-CRNs can be classified into three categories, namely, interweave [7]- [9], overlay [11]- [13] and underlay [14]- [16]. In the interweave paradigm, secondary users (SUs) first harvest energy and then opportunistically access the licensed spectrum when primary users (PUs) are detected as inactive [7]- [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the interweave paradigm, secondary users (SUs) first harvest energy and then opportunistically access the licensed spectrum when primary users (PUs) are detected as inactive [7]- [9]. In the overlay paradigm, SUs use the harvested energy from the PU signal to forward the data of both PUs and SUs, provided that perfect cooperations between PUs and SUs [11]- [13] are assumed. In the underlay paradigm, SUs harvest energy from the RF signal of PUs or other SUs, and transmit with the harvested energy provided the interference to PUs is below a tolerable threshold [14]- [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%