2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2018.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of the multi-objective green cyclical inventory routing problem using discrete multi-swarm PSO method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first case is known as the competitive MCPSO while the second is called the collaborative MCPSO. The performance of MCPSO was evaluated on six benchmarking functions and results have demonstrated that it can perform better than the SPSO [103,104].…”
Section: ) Multi-swarm Psomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first case is known as the competitive MCPSO while the second is called the collaborative MCPSO. The performance of MCPSO was evaluated on six benchmarking functions and results have demonstrated that it can perform better than the SPSO [103,104].…”
Section: ) Multi-swarm Psomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with the discrete particle swarm optimization (PSO), Rau et al [47] developed a heuristic method to improve the solution quality of PSO particle to solve a multi-objective problem. Tirkolaee et al [10] solved a vehicle routing problem with time window (VRPTW) of waste collection by a simulated annealing algorithm.…”
Section: Research About Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5(a) shows the relationship between the taxonomies of the VRP with Environmental Considerations presented here. We can observe (yellow circle on the left) that 12 articles in the sample address the MOO-GVRP(Abad et al, 2018;Androutsopoulos & Zografos, 2017; Coelho et al, 2017; Demir et al, 2014b; Hassanzadeh & Rasti-Barzoki, 2017;Norouzi et al, 2017;Poonthalir & Nadarajan, 2018;Psychas et al, 2016;Rani & Reddy, 2017;Rao et al, 2016;Rau et al, 2018;S. Wang et al, 2018b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%