2014
DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of the rounded leaf offset table in modeling the multileaf collimator leaf edge in a commercial treatment planning system

Abstract: An editable rounded leaf offset (RLO) table is provided in the Pinnacle3 treatment planning software. Default tables are provided for major linear accelerator manufacturers, but it is not clear how the default table values should be adjusted by the user to optimize agreement between the calculated leaf tip value and the actual measured value. Since we wish for the calculated MLC‐defined field edge to closely match the actual delivered field edge, optimal RLO table values are crucial. This is especially true fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rice[ 4 ] used a similar method to optimize the rounded leaf offset table of the MLCi2 in the Philips Pinnacle 3 TPS. Rice's offset table is significantly different from the modified offset table developed in this work.…”
Section: R Esults and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rice[ 4 ] used a similar method to optimize the rounded leaf offset table of the MLCi2 in the Philips Pinnacle 3 TPS. Rice's offset table is significantly different from the modified offset table developed in this work.…”
Section: R Esults and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rounded leaf offset table was measured and modified based on the similar work by Rice. [ 4 ] The radiation field-edge position was measured using an IBA CC13 ionization chamber (IBA Dosimetry GmbH, Schwarzenbruck, Germany) to scan a profile across an 8 cm wide by 40 cm tall opening formed by the MLC banks. The backup jaws were moved to be 1 cm behind the leaf bank (when possible), so they would not impinge on the open field.…”
Section: Aterials and M Ethodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once a reasonable initial model was created, the MLC X position offset was calibrated. Several methods have been proposed to determine optimal model parameters for the MLC position offset, including comparing films of abutting MLC-defined fields with calculations [15,16] or comparing profiles running parallel to the leaves for fields utilizing a wide range of MLC retracted and over-travel positions [14,17]. In this study, we chose to compare profiles acquired at a depth of 10 cm at 100 cm SSD to the calculations to optimize the MLC X position offset parameters.…”
Section: Mlc Leaf Offset Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%