2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing a bi-objective reliable facility location problem with adapted stochastic measures using tuned-parameter multi-objective algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Shankar et al . and Jalali et al . reported encouraging results of exploiting a multiobjective particle swarm optimization and multi‐objective bio‐geography‐based algorithm (MOBBO), respectively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Shankar et al . and Jalali et al . reported encouraging results of exploiting a multiobjective particle swarm optimization and multi‐objective bio‐geography‐based algorithm (MOBBO), respectively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a multi-objective, multi-mode, multicommodity, and multi-period stochastic model was presented by Najafi et al (2013) that was capable of handling real-life emergency relief conditions under capacity and demand uncertainties. Jalali et al (2016) developed a reliable bi-objective facility location model with provider-side uncertainty of facilities that was employed by a set of scenarios. In addition, a meta-heuristic algorithm called multi-objective biogeography-based optimization was employed to find a near-optimal Pareto solution, which was used to verify the solution that was compared with a non-dominated ranking genetic algorithm (NRGA) and a multi-objective SA algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In modern socioeconomic decision-making systems, people often face decision-making problems with a variety of information conditions, such as stochastic information [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], 2-dimension uncertain linguistic information [13,14], intuitionistic fuzzy information [15][16][17][18][19], intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy information [20,21], triangular fuzzy [22], single-valued neutrosophic numbers [23], trapezoidal fuzzy numbers [24], and neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy information [25]. One of them, which have different time-sequence phases and multiple attribute indexes of normally distributed stochastic variables, like street traffic flow, shopping centre popularity at different times, or the customer waiting times, is referred to as dynamic stochastic multiattribute decisionmaking problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with dynamic stochastic decision-making, which comprehensively considers multiple time-sequences, stochastic multi-attribute decision-making under a single static time-sequence environment has received more widespread attention from scholars. These research findings mainly expand on information aggregation operators [1], stochastic dominance [2,3], stochastic multiattribute analysis [4][5][6], set pair connection number analysis [7], prospect stochastic dominance [8,9], bivariate expectation in decision-making [10], probability weighted means [3], and possibility degree interval-valued numbers [11,12], of attribute weights in an unknown state-further expanding the research boundary of stochastic multiattribute decisionmaking. It is difficult for most decision-making results to be comprehensive and rationally optimised based on single time-sequence nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%