2007
DOI: 10.21608/jssae.2007.201270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Irrigation Water Management Practices to Improve Water Productivity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FAO56 presented Kc values for each crop and guideline kept a constant value at each growth stage (Nagarajan & Minu, 2018). crop coefficient variability inevitable within each stage (Shawky et al, 2007) because a fixed value to entire each stage leads to a biased estimation of ETc (Calera et al, 2017;Pôças et al, 2020;Tasumi & Allen, 2007;Rinaldi & He, 2014). Since the Landsat8 scenes are available with an eight-day frequency at the study area (overlapping two paths/rows), thus, Ks and Kc are estimated using Eq.13 and…”
Section: Sebal and Estimate Crop Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FAO56 presented Kc values for each crop and guideline kept a constant value at each growth stage (Nagarajan & Minu, 2018). crop coefficient variability inevitable within each stage (Shawky et al, 2007) because a fixed value to entire each stage leads to a biased estimation of ETc (Calera et al, 2017;Pôças et al, 2020;Tasumi & Allen, 2007;Rinaldi & He, 2014). Since the Landsat8 scenes are available with an eight-day frequency at the study area (overlapping two paths/rows), thus, Ks and Kc are estimated using Eq.13 and…”
Section: Sebal and Estimate Crop Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%