Optimizing Monitoring Programs: A Case Study Based on the OSPAR Eutrophication Assessment for UK Waters

Abstract

The data and results of the UK second application of the OSPAR Common Procedure (COMP) for eutrophication were used as a case study to develop a generic system (i) to evaluate an observational network from a multi-variable point of view, (ii) to introduce additional datasets in the assessment, and (iii) to propose an optimized monitoring program to help reduce monitoring costs. The method consisted of tools to analyse, by means of simple statistical techniques, if any reduction of the available datasets could provide results comparable with the published assessments, and support a reduced monitoring program (and limited loss in confidence). The data reduction scenarios included the removal of an existing dataset or the inclusion of freely available third-party data (FerryBox, satellite observations) with existing datasets. Merging different datasets was problematic due to the heterogeneity of the techniques, sensors and scales, and a cross validation was carried out to assess possible biases between the different datasets. The results showed that there was little margin to remove any of the available datasets and that the use of extensive datasets, such as satellite data, has an important effect, often leading to a change in assessment results with respect to the thresholds, generally moving from threshold exceedance to non-exceedance. This suggested that the results of the original assessment might be biased toward sampling location and time and emphasized the importance of monitoring programmes providing better coverage over large spatial and temporal scales, and the opportunity to improve assessments by combining observations, satellite data, and model results.

Disclosing the truth: Are models better than observations?

“…MMEMs can contribute to the efficient design and optimization of observing systems, and observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs) (e.g. Arnold & Dey 1986) have been successfully used to optimize monitoring programs and design observational networks (Fu et al 2011, Majkut et al 2014, Charria et al 2016, De Mey-Frémaux et al 2019, García-García et al 2019, and to analyze forecasts with or without assimilating virtual observations (Oke & O'Kane 2011). McGillicuddy et al (2001) used an OSSE approach to assess the synopticity of observations, e.g.…”

Local and remote physical processes driving variability of the planktonic system in the Juan Fernández Archipelago: A multidisciplinary framework providing conservation insights

“…fish, gelatinous and siphonophores larvae with a gas bladder; Ballón et al, 2011). enabled the understanding of marine ecosystems (Duarte, Poiner, & Gunn, 2013;García-García et al, 2019;Grand et al, 2019) thanks to technological advances in equipment, the improvement of forecasting models and feedback from communities, contributing to better fisheries management (Painting et al, 2020;Schmidt et al, 2019). The incorporation of new technologies in remote sensors (e.g.…”

Threshold indicators of primary production in the north-east Atlantic for assessing environmental disturbances using 21 years of satellite ocean colour

“…With the advent of ocean colour and the increase in the number, accuracy and resolution of satellite sensors, these data are increasingly being used to track anthropogenic disturbances in the marine environment (Cristina et al, 2015;Novoa et al, 2012). There is on-going effort to integrate in situ with satellite data to re-determine baselines and indicator thresholds for certain regions (Garcia-Garcia et al, 2019). This has proved successful in countries that have large maritime areas with extensive exclusive economic zones (Cristina et al, 2015).…”