2016
DOI: 10.4324/9781315640761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral History Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
64
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Of central importance in life history studies, is the ability to capture the uniqueness of each narrative and the wealth of meanings embedded within these accounts. This of course includes the narrator's subjectivity in terms of how s/he makes sense of their life events (Abrams, 2010). Life history approaches embrace the voices of the marginalised, exploring the fluidity of experiences and subjectivities as well as the interaction with the wider environment (Armitage and Gluck, 1998).…”
Section: Research Approach and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of central importance in life history studies, is the ability to capture the uniqueness of each narrative and the wealth of meanings embedded within these accounts. This of course includes the narrator's subjectivity in terms of how s/he makes sense of their life events (Abrams, 2010). Life history approaches embrace the voices of the marginalised, exploring the fluidity of experiences and subjectivities as well as the interaction with the wider environment (Armitage and Gluck, 1998).…”
Section: Research Approach and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the words of Abrams, "Oral history is a dialogic process; it is a conversation in real time between the interviewer and the narrator, and then between the narrator and what we might call external discourses or culture" (Abrams, 2016, p. 19, cited in Spaskovska, 2017. One could add that it is also a dialogue between the narrator and the particular reader, situated within the past, present and future voices of all the involved people -both those who are remembered, those who are interviewed, those who do the narration and those for whom the story is told.…”
Section: Sc64mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ngunjiri, Hernandez and Chang's view, this context is necessarily complex, multilayered and often brings in memories of the relationships among people with opposing views. However, I would like to go one step further in order to claim, like Abrams (Abrams, 2016), that memories and history are always dialogic, that they are contested and the "context" cannot be finalized by the presentation of an auto-ethnographic study. The very act of its writing and publication is an act of a transgression and a further leap into potentially risky transformations of the intersubjective dynamic.…”
Section: Sc64mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral history can certainly be used to try and fill this gap, but it necessarily imposes a retrospective frame on testimony, generating complex interactions between personal and collective memories, especially when the experience in question has become mythologized in public history, as the mass unemployment of the 1980s undoubtedly has (Abrams, 2010;Portelli, 1997;Samuel & Thompson, 1990).…”
Section: Research-article2016mentioning
confidence: 99%