2013
DOI: 10.3109/01676830.2012.736597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orbital Adherence with Titanium Mesh Floor Implants: A Review of 10 Cases

Abstract: In our series, 7 cases required explantation of the original titanium implant. In these cases a vigorous fibrotic reaction had taken place between the orbital contents and the titanium mesh implant. We postulate that the fibrous reaction between the implant and the orbital contents caused the eye movement restriction and the lid retraction. Implant materials used in orbital floor fracture surgery should be inert with a flat profile rather than a mesh to prevent adhesions through the mesh that may cause cicatri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Polydioxanone maintains up to 12 month in the orbital soft tissue until full degradation, sometimes degradation seems to be incomplete and granulomas occur more often due to a sterile inflammatory cellular reaction lining the degrading polymer fragments. On the other hand a vigorous fibrotic reaction can also be seen in patients with titanium mesh implants [ 11 ]. And furthermore an increased rate of infection, extrusion, implant migration and residual diplopia has also been reported for patients reconstructed with titanium meshes [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polydioxanone maintains up to 12 month in the orbital soft tissue until full degradation, sometimes degradation seems to be incomplete and granulomas occur more often due to a sterile inflammatory cellular reaction lining the degrading polymer fragments. On the other hand a vigorous fibrotic reaction can also be seen in patients with titanium mesh implants [ 11 ]. And furthermore an increased rate of infection, extrusion, implant migration and residual diplopia has also been reported for patients reconstructed with titanium meshes [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of Kersey et al, all operatively managed cases were noted to have an improvement in globe movement on forced-duction test. 11 There was no mention of the forced-duction test for the conservatively managed patients, or in the study of Lee and Nunery. 10 We hypothesize that patients with a negative forced-duction test (Case 2) are likely to have cicatricial scarring and fibrous ingrowth into the orbital mesh to a lesser degree as compared with patients with a positive forced-duction test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the cause of this syndrome is still controversial. Lee and Nunery [11] hypothesized that the titanium material itself was the cause of the adhesions, but Kersey et al [12] explained that the fracture itself frequently leads to a splitting or rupture through the periorbita, leading to adhesion by inadequate separation between the orbital contents and the bone or the implant. Thus, avoidance of titanium implants may be unwarranted if solely to avoid a complication that may occur with or without the titanium mesh.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%