Orchard performance of two plum cultivars on some clonal rootstocks

Kosina, J.

doi:10.17221/3799-hortsci

Cited by 8 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 2 publications

(1 reference statement)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The lowest yield efficiency was in the combination of the cultivar on GF 43, Pixy, Damas C SE 4045 and Myrobalan SE 4044. These results are partially in contrast to the previous results of this trial (Kosina 1998(Kosina , 2000(Kosina , 2004, where some cultivar/rootstock combinations had higher cumulative yields in the first years of the trial and later their productivity was only low or moderate as compared with other combinations, which shows more gradual increase of cumulative yields, but mostly with higher cumulative yields in later period of the trial. The changes in ranking of cultivar/rootstock combinations in growth vigour and yield efficiency during the trial were also Vol.…”

Section: Resultscontrasting

confidence: 99%

“…The significant decrease of the yields and simultaneous increase in growth vigor leads to a significant decrease in yield efficiency on Damas C SE 4045, Pixy and St. Julien A rootstocks during the experiment. These results correspond with previous publications (Kosina 1998(Kosina , 2000(Kosina , 2004. It is also important to present that the evaluated cvs Stanley and Cacanska lepotica were not in the same ontogeny stage at the end of the trial.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 92%

“…That is the main reason to test the same rootstocks in different regions of Europe and of the world. However, the question is, if the rootstock with the cultivar retains qualities in growth and bearing throughout the ontogeny (Hrotkó et al 1998(Hrotkó et al , 2002Kosina 1998Kosina , 2000Kosina , 2004Magyar, Hrotkó 2006) according to Šitt's (Šitt 1952, 1958) ontogenetical stages. These stages describe the life cycle of the fruit trees.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Long-term evaluation of growth and yield of Stanley and Cacanska lepotica plum cultivars on selected rootstocks

et al. 2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mészáros M., Kosina J., LaňarL., Náměstek J. (2015): Long-term evaluation of growth and yield of Stanley and Cacanska lepotica plum cultivars on selected rootstocks. Hort. Sci. (Prague), 42: 22-28.During 1992-2012, trunk cross-section area (TCSA), cumulative yield, yield efficiency and suckering of plum cultivars Stanley and Cacanska lepotica in combinations with vegetative rootstocks Myrobalan SE 4043, Myrobalan SE 4044, MY-KL-A, GF 655/2, GF 43, Damas C SE 4045, Pixy, St. Julien A and generative rootstock Myrobalan seedling were evaluated. The results indicated significant differencies of the characteristics between the evaluated cultivar/rootstock combinations for each cultivar. The long-term experience indicates that the evaluated characteristics of the trees on different rootstocks can significantly change during the ontogenetical developement in the orchard. This is demonstrated by the difference in the entering into the bearing stage, different abudance of the yields, the time of reaching of maximum yields and also in changes of growth intensity. For detailed description of the rootstock characteristics long-term trials are required. For cv. Stanley, Myrobalan SE 4043 is the best rootstock for long-term orchards and St. Julien A for orchards with a higher replanting rate. For cv. Cacanska lepotica, Myrobalan SE 4043 seems to be the best rootstock.Keywords: ontogenesis; stage; productivity; TCSA; bearing; suckering Plum is one of the traditional fruit crops grown in the Czech Republic. For good performance in the orchards, the rootstock has an important influence on the scion cultivar. The most frequently used rootstock in Czech Republic is still the myrobalan seedling. With the increased need for intensification of fruit production, several rootstock trials have already been established and evaluated in central Europe (Hrotkó et al. 1998;Kosina 1998Kosina , 2007Sosna 2002;Sitarek et al. 2007) in order to find more productive scion-rootstock combinations. Authors in these publications presented results of the influence of new rootstocks, described by Hrotkó et al. (1998), Jakob (1992, Hartmann (1995), andWebster (1997), on selected plum cultivars, nevertheless most of them are results from young orchards, which just enter the productive stage. It is interesting to supplement this information with long-term results.Experience from international rootstock trials shows that the performance of a rootstock in combination with the cultivar may change in different agroclimatic conditions (Hartmann et al. 2007). That is the main reason to test the same rootstocks in different regions of Europe and of the world. However, the question is, if the rootstock with the cultivar retains qualities in growth and bearing throughout the ontogeny

show abstract

Section: Resultscontrasting

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 92%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Long-term evaluation of growth and yield of Stanley and Cacanska lepotica plum cultivars on selected rootstocks

et al. 2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Different effect of the rootstocks on tree vigour in particular cultivars, which was observed in this study, is in agreement with previous finding of Kosina (2004).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

“…This study was initiated with the aim to evaluate new productive cultivars and rootstocks suitable for Czech climatic conditions and able to produce high quality fruit for a longer seasonal period (Grzyb, Hartman 1995;Paprštein, Blažek 2003;Kosina 2004;Blažek, Kneifl 2005;Gonda 2006). …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Final evaluation of nine plum cultivars grafted onto two rootstocks in a trial established in 1998 at Holovousy

Blažek

Pištěková

2012

Hortic. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Blažek J., Pištěková I., 2012. Final evaluation of nine plum cultivars grafted onto two rootstocks in a trial established in 1998 at Holovousy. Hort. Sci. (Prague), 39: 108-115.Nine plum cultivars newly introduced into production were evaluated in a replicated trial established in 1998 on two rootstocks planted in a spacing of 5 × 1.5 m. Trees were trained as spindles and evaluated regarding vigour, canopy performance, level and stability of yields, yield efficiency, fruit size, time of flowering and harvest season until 2010. Significant differences among cultivars were found but the most interesting were related to tree vigour, yield efficiency and fruit size. Dwarfing influence of Wangenheim seedling was negligible in Empress and Čačanska lepotica but mostly visible in Sanctus Hubertus. Wegierka Dabrowicka on both the rootstocks had the highest yield efficiency, exceeding 3 kg/m 3 of trunk cross-section area. Yield efficiency of trees grafted on Wangenheim was generally higher than those grafted on Myrobalan but the greatest difference was evidenced on Domestic Prune (more than 25%). Suggestions in terms of trees-spacing are definitively proposed upon results of this study.

show abstract

Productivity of a Selection of Spindle-grown Plum Varieties During the Full-yield Stage

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Orchard performance of two plum cultivars on some clonal rootstocks

Cited by 8 publications

References 2 publications

Long-term evaluation of growth and yield of Stanley and Cacanska lepotica plum cultivars on selected rootstocks

Long-term evaluation of growth and yield of Stanley and Cacanska lepotica plum cultivars on selected rootstocks

Final evaluation of nine plum cultivars grafted onto two rootstocks in a trial established in 1998 at Holovousy

Productivity of a Selection of Spindle-grown Plum Varieties During the Full-yield Stage

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About