OrderlessChain: Do Permissioned Blockchains Need Total Global Order of Transactions?

Nasirifard, Pezhman; Mayer, Ruben; Jacobsen, Hans‐Arno

doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.01477

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As a general rule, we discarded all papers not discussing MVCC conflict control or providing relevant insights and those not published either in a peer-reviewed journal or in the proceedings of a peer-reviewed conference. In general, we excluded approaches not targeting Fabric, or only conceptually, but not technically being based on Hyperledger Fabric, such as [14].…”

Section: B Existing Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transaction Conflict Control in Hyperledger Fabric: A Taxonomy, Gaps, and Design for Conflict Prevention

Debreczeni,

Klenik,

Kocsis

2024

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The execute-order-validate approach to blockchain consensus, most notably implemented by Hyperledger Fabric, facilitates highly scalable execution of smart contract -in Fabric terminology, ''chaincode'' -invocations in cross-organizational blockchains; at the expense of requiring multi-version concurrency control conflict handling during block validation. Consequently, the system-level goodput can be significantly lower than throughput. Although several solutions have been proposed for handling and avoiding conflicts in Hyperledger Fabric, a systematic and holistic approach is missing. We introduce the notion of conflict-controlled operation, propose a novel taxonomy of its means based on the codified principles of dependable computing and categorize the known approaches. Based on this taxonomy, we identified the critical gaps in the state-of-the-art. Design-time conflict prevention is one such gap, and we propose the application of a model-driven engineering process for this purpose. For the last, storage mapping stage of the process, we propose entity attribute partitioning for conflict prevention, describe a data mapperstyle chaincode layer and empirically evaluate our solution.

show abstract

Section: B Existing Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transaction Conflict Control in Hyperledger Fabric: A Taxonomy, Gaps, and Design for Conflict Prevention

Debreczeni,

Klenik,

Kocsis

2024

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Open auctions have the highest transaction input as the bid period ends. In [126], the need for the global order of transactions is discussed for permissioned blockchains. This approach provides global coordination only when the application requires rigorous consistency, such as for the auction's end term.…”

Section: Entry Serializationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Survey on Decentralized Auctioning Systems

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An electronic auction (e-auction) is an efficient negotiation model that allows multiple sellers or buyers to compete for assets or rights. Such systems have become increasingly popular with the evolution of the internet for commerce. In centralized auctioning systems, the presence of a governing third party has been a major trust concern, as such a party may not always be trustworthy or create transaction fees for the hosted auctions. Distributed and decentralized systems based on blockchain for auctions of nonphysical assets have been suggested as a means to distribute and establish trust among peers, and manage disputes and concurrent entries. Although a blockchain system provides attractive features such as decentralized trust management and fraud prevention, it cannot alone support dispute resolutions and adjudications for physical assets. In this paper, we compare blockchain and non-blockchain decentralized auctioning systems based on the identified functional needs and quality attributes. We contrast these needs and attributes with the stateof-the-art models and other implementations of auctioning systems, and discuss the associated trade-offs. We further analyze the gaps in the existing decentralized approaches and propose design approaches for decentralized auctioning systems, for both physical and nonphysical assets, that support dispute resolution and adjudication based on collected evidence, and dispute prevention based on distributed consensus algorithms.

show abstract