2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1319250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ordinal Comparison of Multidimensional Deprivation: Theory and Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No assumptions are made about preferences for one indicator over another. The only criterion the method imposes is that it is better to be nondeprived than deprived in any indicator (Arndt et al 2012;Sonne-Schmidt et al 2008). This is the approach adopted in this study.…”
Section: Povertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No assumptions are made about preferences for one indicator over another. The only criterion the method imposes is that it is better to be nondeprived than deprived in any indicator (Arndt et al 2012;Sonne-Schmidt et al 2008). This is the approach adopted in this study.…”
Section: Povertymentioning
confidence: 99%