2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
116
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
116
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The steps of OPA has been presented as follows (Ataei et al, 2020): Step 1: Determining the criteria: The decision maker should identify essential criteria and sub‐criteria. Step 2: Identifying and ranking the experts (in the case of group decision making): if there are more than one expert, then the problem is group decision making. In this step, the experts should be specified, and the priority of them should be determined.…”
Section: Ordinal Priority Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The steps of OPA has been presented as follows (Ataei et al, 2020): Step 1: Determining the criteria: The decision maker should identify essential criteria and sub‐criteria. Step 2: Identifying and ranking the experts (in the case of group decision making): if there are more than one expert, then the problem is group decision making. In this step, the experts should be specified, and the priority of them should be determined.…”
Section: Ordinal Priority Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to methods such as TOPSIS, ELECTRE, and VIKOR, which require the determination of positive and negative ideal solutions, OPA does not require such solutions whatsoever. OPA was proposed by Ataei, Mahmoudi, Feylizadeh, and Li (2020) that can dominate all the issues mentioned above. Therefore, the current study attempts to extend the OPA under uncertainty conditions for the first time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, the OPA-F is presented along with the definitions of associated variables. Here, it should be noted that the authors are well aware of the pedagogic debate in the multiple criteria decision-making literature, where some scholars distinguish criteria from attributes while emphasizing criteria to be a more general term for attributes (Ataei et al 2020 ; Ekel et al . 2019 ; Ploskas and Papathanasiou 2019 ) although others do not (see, e.g., Javed et al 2020b ; Mahmoudi et al 2019b ; Rezaei 2016 ), sometimes deliberately (Guo and Zhao 2017 ).…”
Section: Preliminaries Of Opa-fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods of aggregation of data (e.g., average versus geometric mean) can also influence results and ranks (Lin et al 2020 ; Saaty and Vargas 2007 ). To solve these issues a team of researchers has recently proposed a breakthrough methodology in multiple attribute decision-making (see, Ataei et al 2020 ). Their method produced reliable results when compared with that of different MADM methods like the AHP, the BWM, TOPSIS, VIKOR, PROMETHEE, and QUALIFLEX.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation