2005
DOI: 10.1080/14783360500077617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational effectiveness model for quality management systems in the Australian construction industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
8
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have been conducted on the implementation of ISO 9000 in small, medium, and large size companies both in the manufacturing (Bhuiyan and Alam, 2005;Lipovatz et al, 1999;Beattie and Sohal, 1999) and service sectors (Poksinska et al, 2006;Karim et al, 2005;Efstratiadis et al, 2000;Sarkar, 1998;Mo and Chan, 1997;Carlsson and Carlsson, 1996;Motwani et al, 1996). Comparative studies have also been done on ISO 9000 standards on manufacturing and service organisations in terms of levels of resources required, motivations for implementation, difficulties faced, benefits gained and management practices applied in the implementation of the ISO 9000 standard and within the same industries but different countries (Ahmed et al, 2005).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been conducted on the implementation of ISO 9000 in small, medium, and large size companies both in the manufacturing (Bhuiyan and Alam, 2005;Lipovatz et al, 1999;Beattie and Sohal, 1999) and service sectors (Poksinska et al, 2006;Karim et al, 2005;Efstratiadis et al, 2000;Sarkar, 1998;Mo and Chan, 1997;Carlsson and Carlsson, 1996;Motwani et al, 1996). Comparative studies have also been done on ISO 9000 standards on manufacturing and service organisations in terms of levels of resources required, motivations for implementation, difficulties faced, benefits gained and management practices applied in the implementation of the ISO 9000 standard and within the same industries but different countries (Ahmed et al, 2005).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, there is a lack of appreciation of QMS approach in managing construction projects due to non-standardisation, where projects look similar but not identical with non-repetition. In support of this, many authors point out that non-standardisation is one of the main barriers of implementation of quality tools in construction (Nesan and Holt, 1999;Karim et al, 2005;Peter et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there are some studies stating that some companies may not have improvement on performance after implementation of QMS [ 68 76 ]. Thus, QMS variables do not show strong relationship with client satisfaction because the data is only collected from construction companies within Malaysia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%