Organizational Learning: Dimensions for a Theory

Abstract

Organizational learning (OL) is receiving increasing attention from researchers and practitioners alike. In fact, some have suggested that the only sustainable competitive advantage is a firm's ability to learn faster than its competitors. In spite of OL's promise, the field has been slow to evolve. The primary impediments to the development of OL theory are that inconsistent terminology is used for comparable concepts and that different definitions are used to describe the phenomenon. Furthermore, many theorists have neglected to make explicit their underlying assumptions about the phenomenon. Employing an inductive approach, this review surfaces the implicit and explicit assumptions of OL researchers, identifying three key dimensions that differentiate perspectives: (1) unit of analysis—individual, group, organizational, and inter organizational; (2) cognitive/behavioral emphasis; and (3) the learning‐performance relationship.

Corporate social capital, market orientation, organizational learning and service innovation performance: An empirical survey in the Pearl river delta of China

“…Organizational learning is a process of absorbing new knowledge and information to improve enterprises' behavior (Crossan, Lane, White & Djurfeldt, 1995). Senge (1990) held that members' learning was an effective method to unite and create knowledge.…”

Improving organizational learning through leadership training

“…It is unclear whether these differences highlight the specific aspects of organizational learning that are important for different groups of stakeholders, or whether they merely indicate actual exposure levels to the intervention and its consequences. Indeed, at the core of organizational learning theory is the idea that learning occurs at all levels, from the individual to the group and the organization (Crossan et al, 1995, Crossan et al, 1999, Marsick and Watkins, 2003. Developing organizational learning requires strength at all these levels (Marsick and Watkins, 2003).…”

“…Scholars have suggested that organizational learning occurs at three levels: the individual, the group, and the organization (Crossan et al, 1995, Crossan et al, 1999, Marsick and Watkins, 2003. Correspondingly, seven distinct but interrelated dimensions of a learning organization have been proposed (Marsick and Watkins, 2003, Yang, 2003, Yang et al, 2004.…”

Organizační učení v odborných diskurzech

“…Zatímco na prahu devadesátých let byly výzkumné texty zaměřené na organizační učení spíše ojedinělé, dnes je nabídka takto založených publikací velmi široká (srov. Argyris, 1992;Crossan et al, 1995Crossan et al, , 1999Dodgson, 1993;Easterby-Smith, 1997;Fiol & Lyles, 1985;Huber, 1991;Levitt & March, 1988;Miller, 1996;Sun & Scott, 2003 aj. ).…”

“…Crossan et al, 1995) a otevírají tím otázku, k čemu má organizační učení vést. V užších vymezeních vede organizační učení k odhalování a korekci chyb, zvládání problémů v činnosti či rozhodování (např.…”